From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF230C3A5A1 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 05:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68511214DA for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 05:10:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 68511214DA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buserror.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46JDMt1lPszDqv3 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:10:33 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=buserror.net (client-ip=165.227.176.147; helo=baldur.buserror.net; envelope-from=oss@buserror.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buserror.net Received: from baldur.buserror.net (baldur.buserror.net [165.227.176.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46JDKq25MRzDqjb for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:08:47 +1000 (AEST) Received: from [2601:449:8400:7293:12bf:48ff:fe84:c9a0] by baldur.buserror.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i2qCA-0007Ui-Om; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:08:35 -0500 Message-ID: <827cc152757906a0ebc04bbe56cdf44683721eb4.camel@buserror.net> From: Scott Wood To: Michael Ellerman Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:08:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878srf4cjk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> References: <20190809100800.5426-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> <529fd908-42d6-f96f-daa2-9010f3035879@huawei.com> <878srf4cjk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Organization: Red Hat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2601:449:8400:7293:12bf:48ff:fe84:c9a0 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, yebin10@huawei.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, jingxiangfeng@huawei.com, fanchengyang@huawei.com, zhaohongjiang@huawei.com, yanaijie@huawei.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, diana.craciun@nxp.com, christophe.leroy@c-s.fr, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, npiggin@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: oss@buserror.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] implement KASLR for powerpc/fsl_booke/32 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 02 Aug 2016 21:08:31 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on baldur.buserror.net) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, keescook@chromium.org, Jason Yan , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, jingxiangfeng@huawei.com, diana.craciun@nxp.com, paulus@samba.org, zhaohongjiang@huawei.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, fanchengyang@huawei.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, yebin10@huawei.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 11:33 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Jason Yan writes: > > A polite ping :) > > > > What else should I do now? > > That's a good question. > > Scott, are you still maintaining FSL bits, Sort of... now that it's become very low volume, it's easy to forget when something does show up (or miss it if I'm not CCed). It'd probably help if I were to just ack patches instead of thinking "I'll do a pull request for this later" when it's just one or two patches per cycle. -Scott