linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: Fix maximum memory value
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 21:13:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rz6qch5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561743225.hrre8pgw6j.naveen@linux.ibm.com>

"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>>> Calculating the maximum memory based on the number of lmbs
>>> and lmb size does not account for the RMA region. Hence
>>> use memory_hotplug_max(), which already accounts for the
>>> RMA region, to fetch the maximum memory value. Thanks to
>>> Nathan Lynch for suggesting the memory_hotplug_max()
>>> function.
>> 
>> Well, I hope I haven't led you astray... will it give you the desired
>> result on a kernel configured without memory hotplug support, booted in
>> an LPAR with some huge pages configured?
>> 
>> If so, then
>> Acked-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
>> 
>> It would likely help with review and future maintenance if the semantics
>> and intended use of the MaxMem field are made a little more
>> explicit. For example, is it supposed to include persistent memory?
>> Perhaps a follow-up patch could address this. Or maybe I'm overthinking
>> it.
>
> This was primarily aimed to replicate what AIX lparstat does and 
> documentation (*) just says:
>
>   Maximum Memory
>       Maximum possible amount of Memory.
>
> I think this mirrors the maximum memory value set in the LPAR profile, 
> and this provides a way to obtain that value from within the LPAR.

But the doc string for memory_hotplug_max() says:

 * memory_hotplug_max - return max address of memory that may be added


ie. maximum *address* not maximum *amount*.

Possibly it turns out to be the same value, but that is just because you
have no holes in your layout.

So I don't think this patch is correct.

cheers

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-04 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-28  6:53 [PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: Fix maximum memory value Aravinda Prasad
2019-06-28 17:27 ` Nathan Lynch
2019-06-28 17:38   ` Naveen N. Rao
2019-06-28 18:19     ` Nathan Lynch
2019-07-04 11:13     ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2019-07-04 11:30       ` Aravinda Prasad
2019-07-01  4:03   ` Aravinda Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871rz6qch5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).