linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] mm/gup: consistently call it GUP-fast
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:46:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8727a618-30c4-4a13-b0e9-eccc3fd67c73@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3922460a-4d01-4ecb-b8c5-7c57fd46f3fd@redhat.com>

> 
> Some of them look like mm-unstable issue, For example, arm64 fails with
> 
>   CC      arch/arm64/mm/extable.o
> In file included from ./include/linux/hugetlb.h:828,
>                  from security/commoncap.c:19:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h:25:34: error: redefinition of
> 'arch_clear_hugetlb_flags'
>    25 | #define arch_clear_hugetlb_flags arch_clear_hugetlb_flags
>       |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/hugetlb.h:840:20: note: in expansion of macro
> 'arch_clear_hugetlb_flags'
>   840 | static inline void arch_clear_hugetlb_flags(struct folio *folio) { }
>       |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h:21:20: note: previous definition of
> 'arch_clear_hugetlb_flags' with t
> ype 'void(struct folio *)'
>    21 | static inline void arch_clear_hugetlb_flags(struct folio *folio)
>       |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./include/linux/hugetlb.h:828,
>                  from mm/filemap.c:37:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h:25:34: error: redefinition of
> 'arch_clear_hugetlb_flags'
>    25 | #define arch_clear_hugetlb_flags arch_clear_hugetlb_flags
>       |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/hugetlb.h:840:20: note: in expansion of macro
> 'arch_clear_hugetlb_flags'
>   840 | static inline void arch_clear_hugetlb_flags(struct folio *folio) { }
>       |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h:21:20: note: previous definition of
> 'arch_clear_hugetlb_flags' with type 'void(struct folio *)'
>    21 | static inline void arch_clear_hugetlb_flags(struct folio *folio)

see: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ZgQvNKGdlDkwhQEX@casper.infradead.org/


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-27 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-27 13:05 [PATCH RFC 0/3] mm/gup: consistently call it GUP-fast David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:05 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] mm/gup: consistently name GUP-fast functions David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 13:52   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-27 13:56     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 14:43   ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 13:05 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] mm/treewide: rename CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP to CONFIG_HAVE_GUP_FAST David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 15:02   ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 13:05 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] mm: use "GUP-fast" instead "fast GUP" in remaining comments David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 15:03   ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 15:21 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] mm/gup: consistently call it GUP-fast Peter Xu
2024-03-27 15:39   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 15:46     ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-03-27 15:47       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-27 16:22     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-28  5:51       ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-28  6:09         ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-28  7:15           ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-28  9:50             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-28 17:46             ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8727a618-30c4-4a13-b0e9-eccc3fd67c73@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).