From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mikey@neuling.org, sbhat@linux.ibm.com,
amachhiw@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>,
gautam@linux.ibm.com, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Invalidate RPT before deleting a guest
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:24:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734w0az50.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r0jntpf8.fsf@kernel.org>
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> writes:
> Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Aneesh,
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this patch. My responses inline below:
>>
>> "Aneesh Kumar K.V (IBM)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>>> Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> From: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> An L0 must invalidate the L2's RPT during H_GUEST_DELETE if this has not
>>>> already been done. This is a slow operation that means H_GUEST_DELETE
>>>> must return H_BUSY multiple times before completing. Invalidating the
>>>> tables before deleting the guest so there is less work for the L0 to do.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h | 1 +
>>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 6 ++++--
>>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c | 2 +-
>>>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
>>>> index 4f527d09c92b..a37736ed3728 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
>>>> @@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ void kvmhv_nested_exit(void);
>>>> void kvmhv_vm_nested_init(struct kvm *kvm);
>>>> long kvmhv_set_partition_table(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>>> long kvmhv_copy_tofrom_guest_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>>> +void kvmhv_flush_lpid(u64 lpid);
>>>> void kvmhv_set_ptbl_entry(u64 lpid, u64 dw0, u64 dw1);
>>>> void kvmhv_release_all_nested(struct kvm *kvm);
>>>> long kvmhv_enter_nested_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>>>> index 1ed6ec140701..5543e8490cd9 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>>>> @@ -5691,10 +5691,12 @@ static void kvmppc_core_destroy_vm_hv(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>> kvmhv_set_ptbl_entry(kvm->arch.lpid, 0, 0);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2())
>>>> + if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2()) {
>>>> + kvmhv_flush_lpid(kvm->arch.lpid);
>>>> plpar_guest_delete(0, kvm->arch.lpid);
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am not sure I follow the optimization here. I would expect the
>>> hypervisor to kill all the translation caches as part of guest_delete.
>>> What is the benefit of doing a lpid flush outside the guest delete?
>>>
>> Thats right. However without this optimization the H_GUEST_DELETE hcall
>> in plpar_guest_delete() returns H_BUSY multiple times resulting in
>> multiple hcalls to the hypervisor until it finishes. Flushing the guest
>> translation cache upfront reduces the number of HCALLs L1 guests has to
>> make to delete a L2 guest via H_GUEST_DELETE.
>>
>
> can we add that as a comment above that kvmhv_flush_lpid()?
Sure, I will put up a comment with that detail in v2 of the patch
series.
>
> -aneesh
--
Cheers
~ Vaibhav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-18 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-01 13:26 [PATCH 00/12] KVM: PPC: Nested APIv2 : Performance improvements Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 01/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Invalidate RPT before deleting a guest Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-07 9:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-12-08 13:45 ` Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-15 16:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-12-18 4:54 ` Vaibhav Jain [this message]
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 02/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Avoid reloading the tb offset Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 03/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Do not check msr on hcalls Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 04/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Get the PID only if needed to copy tofrom a guest Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Ensure LPCR_MER bit is passed to the L0 Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 06/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Handle pending exceptions on guest entry with MSR_EE Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 07/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Do not inject certain interrupts Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 08/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Avoid msr check in kvmppc_handle_exit_hv() Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 09/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Do not call H_COPY_TOFROM_GUEST Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-08 8:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-12-11 3:56 ` Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-11 4:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-12-18 7:02 ` Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-18 7:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 10/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Register the VPA with the L0 Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 11/12] KVM: PPC: Reduce reliance on analyse_instr() in mmio emulation Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-01 13:26 ` [PATCH 12/12] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Do not cancel pending decrementer exception Vaibhav Jain
2023-12-21 10:44 ` [PATCH 00/12] KVM: PPC: Nested APIv2 : Performance improvements Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8734w0az50.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com \
--to=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=amachhiw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=sbhat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).