From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19240C43387 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4209D206C2 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:11:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4209D206C2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43fSKd2CYlzDqWh for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:11:01 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43fSHl1YRpzDqLr for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:09:23 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43fSHb5L9yz9sBQ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:09:15 +1100 (AEDT) From: Michael Ellerman To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] arch: add split IPC system calls where needed In-Reply-To: References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190110162435.309262-15-arnd@arndb.de> <87pnsz28k2.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:09:12 +1100 Message-ID: <874la9zcnr.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux-sh list , Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , Dominik Brodowski , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Deepa Dinamani , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux , linux-s390 , Davidlohr Bueso , y2038 Mailman List , Helge Deller , the arch/x86 maintainers , Russell King - ARM Linux , Ingo Molnar , Geert Uytterhoeven , Firoz Khan , Matt Turner , Fenghua Yu , Will Deacon , linux-m68k , Ivan Kokshaysky , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM , Michal Simek , Tony Luck , Parisc List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Burton , "Eric W . Biederman" , alpha , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , David Miller Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:01 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:59 AM Michael Ellerman wrote: >> > Arnd Bergmann writes: >> > > arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 11 +++++++++++ >> > > arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 11 +++++++++++ >> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 12 ++++++++++++ >> > >> > I have some changes I'd like to make to our syscall table that will >> > clash with this. >> > >> > I'll try and send them today. >> >> Ok. Are those for 5.0 or 5.1? If they are intended for 5.0, it would be >> nice for me to have a branch based on 5.0-rc1 that I can put >> the other patches on top of. > > There is also another change that I considered: > > At the end of my series, we have a lot of entries like > > 245 32 clock_settime sys_clock_settime32 > 245 64 clock_settime sys_clock_settime > 245 spu clock_settime sys_clock_settime > > which could be folded into > > 245 32 clock_settime sys_clock_settime32 > 245 spu64 clock_settime sys_clock_settime > > if we just add another option to the ABI field. Any thoughts on > that? My series splits spu out into a separate field. So the above would be: 245 32 - clock_settime sys_clock_settime32 245 64 spu clock_settime sys_clock_settime cheers