Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: Use ARRAY_SIZE to replace its implementation

[Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>]

zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> writes:
> Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of dividing sizeof array with sizeof an element.
> So just replace it.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

This code is copied from binutils and we don't want to needlessly cause
it to diverge from the binutils copy.

So thanks but no thanks.

cheers

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c
> index ac2b55b..f3f57a1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/ppc-opc.c
> @@ -966,8 +966,7 @@
>    { 0xff, 11, NULL, NULL, PPC_OPERAND_SIGNOPT },
>  };
>  
> -const unsigned int num_powerpc_operands = (sizeof (powerpc_operands)
> -					   / sizeof (powerpc_operands[0]));
> +const unsigned int num_powerpc_operands = ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_operands);
>  
>  /* The functions used to insert and extract complicated operands.  */
>  
> @@ -6980,8 +6979,7 @@
>  {"fcfidu.",	XRC(63,974,1),	XRA_MASK, POWER7|PPCA2,	PPCVLE,		{FRT, FRB}},
>  };
>  
> -const int powerpc_num_opcodes =
> -  sizeof (powerpc_opcodes) / sizeof (powerpc_opcodes[0]);
> +const int powerpc_num_opcodes = ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_opcodes);
>  \f
>  /* The VLE opcode table.
>  
> @@ -7219,8 +7217,7 @@
>  {"se_bl",	BD8(58,0,1),	BD8_MASK,	PPCVLE,	0,		{B8}},
>  };
>  
> -const int vle_num_opcodes =
> -  sizeof (vle_opcodes) / sizeof (vle_opcodes[0]);
> +const int vle_num_opcodes = ARRAY_SIZE(vle_opcodes);
>  \f
>  /* The macro table.  This is only used by the assembler.  */
>  
> @@ -7288,5 +7285,4 @@
>  {"e_clrlslwi",4, PPCVLE, "e_rlwinm %0,%1,%3,(%2)-(%3),31-(%3)"},
>  };
>  
> -const int powerpc_num_macros =
> -  sizeof (powerpc_macros) / sizeof (powerpc_macros[0]);
> +const int powerpc_num_macros = ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_macros);
> -- 
> 1.7.12.4