From: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Oliver <oohall@gmail.com>, Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 14:54:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7uhqbwv.fsf@santosiv.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f722e532-070e-1961-3bae-6f385caa5ead@csgroup.eu>
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 09/07/2020 à 09:56, Santosh Sivaraj a écrit :
>> Introduce notification chain which lets know about uncorrected memory
>> errors(UE). This would help prospective users in pmem or nvdimm subsystem
>> to track bad blocks for better handling of persistent memory allocations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh S <santosh@fossix.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/mce.h | 2 ++
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> Send the two patches together, so the dependencies are clear. The earlier patch reviews are
>> here: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200330071219.12284-1-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com/
>>
>> Rebase the patches on top on 5.8-rc4
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mce.h
>> index 376a395daf329..a57b0772702a9 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mce.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mce.h
>> @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ extern void machine_check_print_event_info(struct machine_check_event *evt,
>> unsigned long addr_to_pfn(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr);
>> extern void mce_common_process_ue(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> struct mce_error_info *mce_err);
>> +extern int mce_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>> +extern int mce_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>
> Using the 'extern' keyword on function declaration is pointless and
> should be avoided in new patches. (checkpatch.pl --strict usually
> complains about it).
I will remove that in the v2 which I will be sending for your comments for
the other patch.
Thanks,
Santosh
>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
>> void flush_and_reload_slb(void);
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 */
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c
>> index fd90c0eda2290..b7b3ed4e61937 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce.c
>> @@ -49,6 +49,20 @@ static struct irq_work mce_ue_event_irq_work = {
>>
>> DECLARE_WORK(mce_ue_event_work, machine_process_ue_event);
>>
>> +static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(mce_notifier_list);
>> +
>> +int mce_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>> +{
>> + return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&mce_notifier_list, nb);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mce_register_notifier);
>> +
>> +int mce_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>> +{
>> + return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&mce_notifier_list, nb);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mce_unregister_notifier);
>> +
>> static void mce_set_error_info(struct machine_check_event *mce,
>> struct mce_error_info *mce_err)
>> {
>> @@ -278,6 +292,7 @@ static void machine_process_ue_event(struct work_struct *work)
>> while (__this_cpu_read(mce_ue_count) > 0) {
>> index = __this_cpu_read(mce_ue_count) - 1;
>> evt = this_cpu_ptr(&mce_ue_event_queue[index]);
>> + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&mce_notifier_list, 0, evt);
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
>> /*
>> * This should probably queued elsewhere, but
>>
>
> Christophe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-09 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-09 7:56 [PATCH RESEND 1/2] powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain Santosh Sivaraj
2020-07-09 7:56 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges Santosh Sivaraj
2020-07-09 8:17 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-07-09 9:22 ` Santosh Sivaraj
2020-07-09 8:07 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain Christophe Leroy
2020-07-09 9:24 ` Santosh Sivaraj [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h7uhqbwv.fsf@santosiv.in.ibm.com \
--to=santosh@fossix.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).