From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: vmlinux.lds: Drop Binutils 2.18 workarounds
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:22:36 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8bvkbar.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190321233420.GD3969@gate.crashing.org>
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:02:53AM +1030, Joel Stanley wrote:
>> Segher added some workarounds for GCC 4.2 and bintuils 2.18. We now set
>> 4.6 and 2.20 as the minimum, so they can be dropped.
>
> It was a bug in binutils _before_ 2.18, only seen by people using GCC
> _before_ 4.2.
>
> It's all ancient history by now, and good riddance :-)
>
>> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
>
> Acked-by: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Thanks.
I updated the change log slightly:
powerpc/vmlinux.lds: Drop binutils < 2.18 workarounds
Segher added some workarounds for binutils < 2.18 and GCC < 4.2. We
now set GCC 4.6 and binutils 2.20 as the minimum, so the workarounds
can be dropped.
This is mostly a revert of c69cccc95fe4 ("powerpc: Fix build bug with
binutils < 2.18 and GCC < 4.2").
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-22 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-21 0:32 [PATCH] powerpc: vmlinux.lds: Drop Binutils 2.18 workarounds Joel Stanley
2019-03-21 23:34 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-03-22 0:22 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2019-03-26 0:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-03-26 7:55 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-03-26 18:19 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-03-26 19:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-03-26 20:12 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-03-26 22:29 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-03-26 22:59 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-03-27 6:40 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-03-27 12:47 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-03-27 18:21 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-03-28 6:19 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-03-28 15:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-03-27 8:56 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-03-27 9:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-03-26 8:08 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h8bvkbar.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).