linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
To: Uma Krishnan <ukrishn@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"Matthew R. Ochs" <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Manoj N. Kumar" <manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] cxlflash: Fix to avoid virtual LUN failover failure
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:00:25 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9jl7hg6.fsf@gamma.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449788029-23093-1-git-send-email-ukrishn@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2950 bytes --]


> Virtual LUNs may be accessed through one or both ports of the adapter.

Is it possible that there might ever be adapters with a number of ports
other than 2? In particular, is it possible for 3 or 4 port adapters to
exist?

If so, do you need something with a bit more fidelity?

If not, this is a good approach.

Regards,
Daniel

> This access is encoded in the translation entries that comprise the
> virtual LUN and used by the AFU for load-balancing I/O and handling
> failover scenarios. In a link loss scenario, even though the AFU is
> able to maintain connectivity to the LUN, it is up to the application
> to retry the failed I/O. When applications are unaware of the virtual
> LUN's underlying topology, they are unable to make a sound decision of
> when to retry an I/O and therefore are forced to make their reaction to
> a failed I/O absolute. The result is either a failure to retry I/O or
> increased latency for scenarios where a retry is pointless.
>
> To remedy this scenario, provide feedback back to the application on
> virtual LUN creation as to which ports the LUN may be accessed. LUN's
> spanning both ports are candidates for a retry in a presence of an I/O
> failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/cxlflash/vlun.c       |  2 ++
>  include/uapi/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/vlun.c b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/vlun.c
> index a53f583..50f8e93 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/vlun.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/cxlflash/vlun.c
> @@ -1008,6 +1008,8 @@ int cxlflash_disk_virtual_open(struct scsi_device *sdev, void *arg)
>  	virt->last_lba = last_lba;
>  	virt->rsrc_handle = rsrc_handle;
>  
> +	if (lli->port_sel == BOTH_PORTS)
> +		virt->hdr.return_flags |= DK_CXLFLASH_ALL_PORTS_ACTIVE;
>  out:
>  	if (likely(ctxi))
>  		put_context(ctxi);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h b/include/uapi/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h
> index 831351b..2302f3c 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,16 @@ struct dk_cxlflash_hdr {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> + * Return flag definitions available to all ioctls
> + *
> + * Similar to the input flags, these are grown from the bottom-up with the
> + * intention that ioctl-specific return flag definitions would grow from the
> + * top-down, allowing the two sets to co-exist. While not required/enforced
> + * at this time, this provides future flexibility.
> + */
> +#define DK_CXLFLASH_ALL_PORTS_ACTIVE	0x0000000000000001ULL
> +
> +/*
>   * Notes:
>   * -----
>   * The 'context_id' field of all ioctl structures contains the context
> -- 
> 2.1.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 859 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-14  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-10 22:51 [PATCH 0/6] cxlflash: Miscellaneous fixes and updates Uma Krishnan
2015-12-10 22:53 ` [PATCH 1/6] cxlflash: Fix to escalate LINK_RESET also on port 1 Uma Krishnan
2015-12-14 17:30   ` Matthew R. Ochs
2015-12-17 21:24     ` Uma Krishnan
2015-12-10 22:53 ` [PATCH 2/6] cxlflash: Fix to avoid virtual LUN failover failure Uma Krishnan
2015-12-11 14:53   ` Manoj Kumar
2015-12-14  5:00   ` Daniel Axtens [this message]
2015-12-17 22:19   ` Uma Krishnan
2015-12-10 22:54 ` [PATCH 3/6] cxlflash: Updated date of the driver Uma Krishnan
2015-12-11  0:35   ` Daniel Axtens
2015-12-14 19:29     ` Uma Krishnan
2015-12-10 22:54 ` [PATCH 4/6] cxlflash: Fix to resolve cmd leak after host reset Uma Krishnan
2015-12-14 17:31   ` Matthew R. Ochs
2015-12-10 22:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] cxlflash: Resolve oops in wait_port_offline Uma Krishnan
2015-12-14 17:32   ` Matthew R. Ochs
2015-12-17 22:30   ` Uma Krishnan
2015-12-10 22:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] cxlflash: Enable device id for future IBM CXL adapter Uma Krishnan
2015-12-14  3:47   ` Andrew Donnellan
2015-12-14 17:18     ` Manoj Kumar
2015-12-14 17:32   ` Matthew R. Ochs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h9jl7hg6.fsf@gamma.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ukrishn@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).