From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C077AC282DB for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46D9121904 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:15:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 46D9121904 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43rZK54DmLzDqgW for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 22:15:37 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43rZH44n0tzDqZN for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 22:13:52 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43rZH42WH3z9s4Z; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 22:13:52 +1100 (AEDT) From: Michael Ellerman To: Chandan Rajendra , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: BUG: memcmp(): Accessing invalid memory location In-Reply-To: <87tvhpnmpe.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> References: <17042269.pB4heZKTbK@localhost.localdomain> <87tvhpnmpe.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 22:13:52 +1100 Message-ID: <87imy3oj67.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Anton Blanchard , Simon Guo Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Michael Ellerman writes: > Adding Simon who wrote the code. > > Chandan Rajendra writes: >> When executing fstests' generic/026 test, I hit the following call trace, >> >> [ 417.061038] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access at 0xc00000062ac40000 >> [ 417.062172] Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000092240 >> [ 417.062242] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] >> [ 417.062299] LE SMP NR_CPUS=2048 DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NUMA pSeries >> [ 417.062366] Modules linked in: >> [ 417.062401] CPU: 0 PID: 27828 Comm: chacl Not tainted 5.0.0-rc2-next-20190115-00001-g6de6dba64dda #1 >> [ 417.062495] NIP: c000000000092240 LR: c00000000066a55c CTR: 0000000000000000 >> [ 417.062567] REGS: c00000062c0c3430 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (5.0.0-rc2-next-20190115-00001-g6de6dba64dda) >> [ 417.062660] MSR: 8000000002009033 CR: 44000842 XER: 20000000 >> [ 417.062750] CFAR: 00007fff7f3108ac DAR: c00000062ac40000 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 0 >> GPR00: 0000000000000000 c00000062c0c36c0 c0000000017f4c00 c00000000121a660 >> GPR04: c00000062ac3fff9 0000000000000004 0000000000000020 00000000275b19c4 >> GPR08: 000000000000000c 46494c4500000000 5347495f41434c5f c0000000026073a0 >> GPR12: 0000000000000000 c0000000027a0000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 >> GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 >> GPR20: c00000062ea70020 c00000062c0c38d0 0000000000000002 0000000000000002 >> GPR24: c00000062ac3ffe8 00000000275b19c4 0000000000000001 c00000062ac30000 >> GPR28: c00000062c0c38d0 c00000062ac30050 c00000062ac30058 0000000000000000 >> [ 417.063563] NIP [c000000000092240] memcmp+0x120/0x690 >> [ 417.063635] LR [c00000000066a55c] xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int+0x53c/0x5b0 >> [ 417.063709] Call Trace: >> [ 417.063744] [c00000062c0c36c0] [c00000000066a098] xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int+0x78/0x5b0 (unreliable) >> [ 417.063851] [c00000062c0c3760] [c000000000693f8c] xfs_da3_node_lookup_int+0x32c/0x5a0 >> [ 417.063944] [c00000062c0c3820] [c0000000006634a0] xfs_attr_node_addname+0x170/0x6b0 >> [ 417.064034] [c00000062c0c38b0] [c000000000664ffc] xfs_attr_set+0x2ac/0x340 >> [ 417.064118] [c00000062c0c39a0] [c000000000758d40] __xfs_set_acl+0xf0/0x230 >> [ 417.064190] [c00000062c0c3a00] [c000000000758f50] xfs_set_acl+0xd0/0x160 >> [ 417.064268] [c00000062c0c3aa0] [c0000000004b69b0] set_posix_acl+0xc0/0x130 >> [ 417.064339] [c00000062c0c3ae0] [c0000000004b6a88] posix_acl_xattr_set+0x68/0x110 >> [ 417.064412] [c00000062c0c3b20] [c0000000004532d4] __vfs_setxattr+0xa4/0x110 >> [ 417.064485] [c00000062c0c3b80] [c000000000454c2c] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0xac/0x240 >> [ 417.064566] [c00000062c0c3bd0] [c000000000454ee8] vfs_setxattr+0x128/0x130 >> [ 417.064638] [c00000062c0c3c30] [c000000000455138] setxattr+0x248/0x600 >> [ 417.064710] [c00000062c0c3d90] [c000000000455738] path_setxattr+0x108/0x120 >> [ 417.064785] [c00000062c0c3e00] [c000000000455778] sys_setxattr+0x28/0x40 >> [ 417.064858] [c00000062c0c3e20] [c00000000000bae4] system_call+0x5c/0x70 >> [ 417.064930] Instruction dump: >> [ 417.064964] 7d201c28 7d402428 7c295040 38630008 38840008 408201f0 4200ffe8 2c050000 >> [ 417.065051] 4182ff6c 20c50008 54c61838 7d201c28 <7d402428> 7d293436 7d4a3436 7c295040 >> [ 417.065150] ---[ end trace 0d060411b5e3741b ]--- >> >> >> Both the memory locations passed to memcmp() had "SGI_ACL_FILE" and len >> argument of memcmp() was set to 12. s1 argument of memcmp() had the value >> 0x00000000f4af0485, while s2 argument had the value 0x00000000ce9e316f. >> >> The following is the code path within memcmp() that gets executed for the >> above mentioned values, >> >> - Since len (i.e. 12) is greater than 7, we branch to .Lno_short. >> - We then prefetch the contents of r3 & r4 and branch to >> .Ldiffoffset_8bytes_make_align_start. >> - Under .Ldiffoffset_novmx_cmp, Since r3 is unaligned we end up comparing >> "SGI" part of the string. r3's value is then aligned. r4's value is >> incremented by 3. For comparing the remaining 9 bytes, we jump to >> .Lcmp_lt32bytes. >> - Here, 8 bytes of the remaining 9 bytes are compared and execution moves to >> .Lcmp_rest_lt8bytes. >> - Here we execute "LD rB,0,r4". In the case of this bug, r4 has an unaligned >> value and hence ends up accessing the "next" double word. The "next" double >> word happens to occur after the last page mapped into the kernel's address >> space and hence this leads to the previously listed oops. > > Thanks for the analysis. > > This is just a bug, we can't read past the end of the source or dest. How about this, works for me. cheers diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S index 844d8e774492..2a302158cb53 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S @@ -215,20 +215,29 @@ _GLOBAL_TOC(memcmp) beq .Lzero .Lcmp_rest_lt8bytes: - /* Here we have only less than 8 bytes to compare with. at least s1 - * Address is aligned with 8 bytes. - * The next double words are load and shift right with appropriate - * bits. + /* + * Here we have less than 8 bytes left to compare with. We mustn't read + * past the end of either source or dest. */ - subfic r6,r5,8 - slwi r6,r6,3 - LD rA,0,r3 - LD rB,0,r4 - srd rA,rA,r6 - srd rB,rB,r6 - cmpld cr0,rA,rB + + /* If we have less than 4 bytes, just do byte at a time */ + cmpwi cr1, r5, 4 + blt cr1, .Lshort + + /* Compare 4 bytes */ + LW rA,0,r3 + LW rB,0,r4 + cmpd cr0,rA,rB bne cr0,.LcmpAB_lightweight - b .Lzero + + /* If we had exactly 4 bytes left, we're done now */ + beq cr1, .Lzero + + /* Otherwise do what ever's left a byte at a time */ + subi r5, r5, 4 + addi r3, r3, 4 + addi r4, r4, 4 + b .Lshort .Lnon_zero: mr r3,rC