From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc/6xx: Don't set back MSR_RI before reenabling MMU
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 22:10:30 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lg2zojbt.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f9dd859d571e324c7412ed9db9da8cfba678257.1548956511.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:
> By delaying the setting of MSR_RI, a 1% improvment is optained on
> null_syscall selftest on an mpc8321.
>
> Without this patch:
>
> root@vgoippro:~# ./null_syscall
> 1134.33 ns 378.11 cycles
>
> With this patch:
>
> root@vgoippro:~# ./null_syscall
> 1121.85 ns 373.95 cycles
>
> The drawback is that a machine check during that period
> would be unrecoverable, but as only main memory is accessed
> during that period, it shouldn't be a concern.
On 64-bit server CPUs accessing main memory can cause a UE
(Uncorrectable Error) which can trigger a machine check.
So it may still be a concern, it depends how paranoid you are.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S
> index 146385b1c2da..ea28a6ab56ec 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S
> @@ -282,8 +282,6 @@ __secondary_hold_acknowledge:
> stw r1,GPR1(r11); \
> stw r1,0(r11); \
> tovirt(r1,r11); /* set new kernel sp */ \
> - li r10,MSR_KERNEL & ~(MSR_IR|MSR_DR); /* can take exceptions */ \
> - MTMSRD(r10); /* (except for mach check in rtas) */ \
> stw r0,GPR0(r11); \
> lis r10,STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER@ha; /* exception frame marker */ \
> addi r10,r10,STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER@l; \
Where does RI get enabled? I don't see it anywhere obvious.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-01 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-31 17:44 [RFC PATCH] powerpc/6xx: Don't set back MSR_RI before reenabling MMU Christophe Leroy
2019-02-01 11:10 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2019-02-01 11:51 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-02-12 13:24 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lg2zojbt.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).