From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Geetika Moolchandani <Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc/numa: Print debug statements only when required
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:01:42 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1ehbrux.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823093801.GK21942@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> * Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> [2021-08-23 11:21:33]:
>> Le 21/08/2021 à 12:25, Srikar Dronamraju a écrit :
>> > Currently, a debug message gets printed every time an attempt to
>> > add(remove) a CPU. However this is redundant if the CPU is already added
>> > (removed) from the node.
>> >
>> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>> > Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
>> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> > Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
>> > Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>> > Cc: Geetika Moolchandani <Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com>
>> > Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > ---
>> > arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 11 +++++------
>> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> > index f2bf98bdcea2..fbe03f6840e0 100644
>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> > @@ -141,10 +141,11 @@ static void map_cpu_to_node(int cpu, int node)
>> > {
>> > update_numa_cpu_lookup_table(cpu, node);
>> > - dbg("adding cpu %d to node %d\n", cpu, node);
>> > - if (!(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node])))
>> > + if (!(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node]))) {
>> > + dbg("adding cpu %d to node %d\n", cpu, node);
>> > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
>> > + }
>> > }
>> > #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
>> > @@ -152,13 +153,11 @@ static void unmap_cpu_from_node(unsigned long cpu)
>> > {
>> > int node = numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu];
>> > - dbg("removing cpu %lu from node %d\n", cpu, node);
>> > -
>> > if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node])) {
>> > cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
>> > + dbg("removing cpu %lu from node %d\n", cpu, node);
>> > } else {
>> > - printk(KERN_ERR "WARNING: cpu %lu not found in node %d\n",
>> > - cpu, node);
>> > + pr_err("WARNING: cpu %lu not found in node %d\n", cpu, node);
>>
>> Would pr_warn() be more appropriate here (or removing the "WARNING" statement)?
>
> Its a fair point.
>
> Michael,
>
> Do you want me to resend this patch with s/pr_err/pr_warn for the above
> line?
I think what I'd prefer is if we stopped using this custom dbg() stuff
in numa.c, and cleaned up all the messages to use pr_xxx().
Those debug statements only appear if you boot with numa=debug, which is
not documented anywhere and I had completely forgotten existed TBH.
These days there's CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG for turning on/off messages,
which is much more flexible.
So can we drop the numa=debug bits, and convert all the dbg()s to
pr_debug().
And then do a pass converting all the printk("NUMA: ") to pr_xxx() which
will get "numa:" from pr_fmt().
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-25 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-21 10:25 [PATCH v2 0/3] Updates to powerpc for robust CPU online/offline Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-21 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc/numa: Print debug statements only when required Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-23 9:21 ` Laurent Dufour
2021-08-23 9:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-25 13:01 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2021-08-26 4:47 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-21 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc/numa: Update cpu_cpu_map on CPU online/offline Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-21 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/numa: Fill distance_lookup_table for offline nodes Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-26 13:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-09-01 10:22 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-09-23 11:17 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-09-23 17:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-10-11 11:45 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-08-23 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Updates to powerpc for robust CPU online/offline Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-23 9:34 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-08-23 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r1ehbrux.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).