From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722A2CA9EA0 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 16:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 084AB21D80 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 16:10:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 084AB21D80 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46x4WB4WlszDqM4 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:10:46 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46x4T74DJwzDqLp for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:08:59 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46x4T73QH6z8tT3 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:08:59 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 46x4T72tm3z9sPL; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:08:59 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net (client-ip=212.18.0.9; helo=mail-out.m-online.net; envelope-from=whitebox@nefkom.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46x4T60yydz9sP4 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 03:08:55 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46x4Sz22W4z1qqkW; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 18:08:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46x4Sz0XmZz1qqkJ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 18:08:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N2KaEBdizuWk; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 18:08:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: YJWIZPDD7LMVaFkeEiLlQ/K4EmGB2UyMG0EJuy57+77lq6NPAQkkeYcxWsPMSMiq Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-172-176.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.172.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 18:08:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7AFAD2C01E5; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 18:08:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: passing NULL to clock_getres (VDSO): terminated by unexpected signal 11 References: <0fc22a08-31d9-e4d1-557e-bf5b482a9a20__6444.28012180782$1571503753$gmane$org@c-s.fr> <87v9skcznp.fsf@igel.home> <87tv83zqt1.fsf@hase.home> <875zkjipra.fsf@igel.home> X-Yow: It's NO USE.. I've gone to ``CLUB MED''!! Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 18:08:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Thomas Gleixner's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:45:45 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <87r237h01a.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nathan Lynch , Vincenzo Frascino , "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Okt 20 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > POSIX does not mention anything about the validity of the pointer handed to > clock_getres(). Sure it does: "If the argument res is not NULL, the resolution of the specified clock shall be stored in the location pointed to by res. If res is NULL, the clock resolution is not returned.". Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."