linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: dan.j.williams@intel.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/nvdimm: Pick the right alignment default when creating dax devices
Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 14:25:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgtaddru.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de5cbe7d-bd47-6793-1f1a-2274c5c59eb5@linux.ibm.com>


Hi Dan,

"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> On 5/17/19 8:19 PM, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
>> Hi Aneesh,
>> 

....

>>
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Check whether the we support the alignment. For Dax if the
>>> +	 * superblock alignment is not matching, we won't initialize
>>> +	 * the device.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (!nd_supported_alignment(align) &&
>>> +	    memcmp(pfn_sb->signature, DAX_SIG, PFN_SIG_LEN)) {
>> Suggestion to change this check to:
>> 
>> if (memcmp(pfn_sb->signature, DAX_SIG, PFN_SIG_LEN) &&
>>     !nd_supported_alignment(align))
>> 
>> It would look  a bit more natural i.e. "If the device has dax signature and alignment is
>> not supported".
>> 
>
> I guess that should be !memcmp()? . I will send an updated patch with 
> the hash failure details in the commit message.
>

We need clarification on what the expected failure behaviour should be.
The nd_pmem_probe doesn't really have a failure behaviour in this
regard. For example.

I created a dax device with 16M alignment

{                                          
  "dev":"namespace0.0",
  "mode":"devdax",                         
  "map":"dev",                             
  "size":"9.98 GiB (10.72 GB)",
  "uuid":"ba62ef22-ebdf-4779-96f5-e6135383ed22",
  "raw_uuid":"7b2492f9-7160-4ee9-9c3d-2f547d9ef3ee",
  "daxregion":{                            
    "id":0,                                
    "size":"9.98 GiB (10.72 GB)",
    "align":16777216,
    "devices":[                            
      {                                    
        "chardev":"dax0.0",
        "size":"9.98 GiB (10.72 GB)"
      }                                    
    ]                                      
  },                                       
  "align":16777216,                        
  "numa_node":0,                           
  "supported_alignments":[
    65536,                                 
    16777216                               
  ]                                        
}      

Now what we want is to fail the initialization of the device when we
boot a kernel that doesn't support 16M page size. But with the
nd_pmem_probe failure behaviour we now end up with

[
  {
    "dev":"namespace0.0",
    "mode":"fsdax",
    "map":"mem",
    "size":10737418240,
    "uuid":"7b2492f9-7160-4ee9-9c3d-2f547d9ef3ee",
    "blockdev":"pmem0"
  }
]

So it did fallthrough the

	/* if we find a valid info-block we'll come back as that personality */
	if (nd_btt_probe(dev, ndns) == 0 || nd_pfn_probe(dev, ndns) == 0
			|| nd_dax_probe(dev, ndns) == 0)
		return -ENXIO;

	/* ...otherwise we're just a raw pmem device */
	return pmem_attach_disk(dev, ndns);


Is it ok if i update the code such that we don't do that default
pmem_atach_disk if we have a label area?

-aneesh


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-19  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-14  2:54 [PATCH] mm/nvdimm: Pick the right alignment default when creating dax devices Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-05-17 14:49 ` Vaibhav Jain
2019-05-17 15:17   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-05-19  8:55     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2019-05-19 16:30       ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sgtaddru.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).