From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D6BC56202 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 07:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D3A206C0 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 07:44:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B3D3A206C0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ChVCM73frzDr8L for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:44:47 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu (client-ip=93.17.236.30; helo=pegase1.c-s.fr; envelope-from=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr (pegase1.c-s.fr [93.17.236.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ChV9c5PFXzDqtd for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:43:10 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (mailhub1-int [192.168.12.234]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ChV9N0QZ3z9tyml; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [192.168.12.234]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zzh3qFKoj4i5; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ChV9M6Z4Bz9tymk; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90558B7E5; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id ztElmbecXLrB; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.4.90] (unknown [192.168.4.90]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797138B7E4; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:04 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/22] powerpc/exec: Set thread.regs early during exec To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au References: <20201125051634.509286-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> <20201125051634.509286-10-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> <87k0u8tvoj.fsf@linux.ibm.com> From: Christophe Leroy Message-ID: <88355dab-025e-ebb5-41f5-6b48035b48c0@csgroup.eu> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87k0u8tvoj.fsf@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Le 26/11/2020 à 08:38, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit : > Christophe Leroy writes: > >> Le 25/11/2020 à 06:16, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit : > .... > >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c >>> @@ -1530,10 +1530,32 @@ void flush_thread(void) >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 >>> void arch_setup_new_exec(void) >>> { >>> - if (radix_enabled()) >>> - return; >>> - hash__setup_new_exec(); >>> + if (!radix_enabled()) >>> + hash__setup_new_exec(); >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * If we exec out of a kernel thread then thread.regs will not be >>> + * set. Do it now. >>> + */ >>> + if (!current->thread.regs) { >>> + struct pt_regs *regs = task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE; >>> + current->thread.regs = regs - 1; >>> + } >>> + >>> +} >>> +#else >>> +void arch_setup_new_exec(void) >>> +{ >>> + /* >>> + * If we exec out of a kernel thread then thread.regs will not be >>> + * set. Do it now. >>> + */ >>> + if (!current->thread.regs) { >>> + struct pt_regs *regs = task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE; >>> + current->thread.regs = regs - 1; >>> + } >>> } >>> + >>> #endif >> >> No need to duplicate arch_setup_new_exec() I think. radix_enabled() is defined at all time so the >> first function should be valid at all time. >> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c: In function ‘arch_setup_new_exec’: > arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c:1529:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘hash__setup_new_exec’; did you mean ‘arch_setup_new_exec’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 1529 | hash__setup_new_exec(); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | arch_setup_new_exec > > > That requires us to have hash__setup_new_exec prototype for all platforms. Yes indeed. So maybe, just enclose that part in the #ifdef instead of duplicating the common part ? Christophe