linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/3] powerpc: Don't hide eh field of lwarx behind a macro
Date: Tue,  2 Aug 2022 11:02:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b9c8a1a14f9143552a85fcbf96698224a8c2469.1659430931.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1176e19e627dd6a1b8d24c6c457a8ab874b7d12.1659430931.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

The eh field must remain 0 for PPC32 and is only used
by PPC64.

Don't hide that behind a macro, just leave the responsibility
to the user.

At the time being, the only users of PPC_RAW_L{WDQ}ARX are
setting the eh field to 0, so the special handling of __PPC_EH
is useless. Just take the value given by the caller.

Same for DEFINE_TESTOP(), don't do special handling in that
macro, ensure the caller hands over the proper eh value.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h     |  4 ++--
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 11 +----------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
index 344fba3b16eb..c2b8c53e0dcb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static inline unsigned long fn(			\
 	"bne- 1b\n"					\
 	postfix						\
 	: "=&r" (old), "=&r" (t)			\
-	: "rK" (mask), "r" (p), "i" (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) ? eh : 0)	\
+	: "rK" (mask), "r" (p), "i" (eh)		\
 	: "cc", "memory");				\
 	return (old & mask);				\
 }
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static inline unsigned long fn(			\
 DEFINE_TESTOP(test_and_set_bits, or, PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER,
 	      PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER, 0)
 DEFINE_TESTOP(test_and_set_bits_lock, or, "",
-	      PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, 1)
+	      PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64))
 DEFINE_TESTOP(test_and_change_bits, xor, PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER,
 	      PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER, 0)
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
index 7b81b37a191e..d9703c5fd713 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -343,6 +343,7 @@
 #define __PPC_SPR(r)	((((r) & 0x1f) << 16) | ((((r) >> 5) & 0x1f) << 11))
 #define __PPC_RC21	(0x1 << 10)
 #define __PPC_PRFX_R(r)	(((r) & 0x1) << 20)
+#define __PPC_EH(eh)	(((eh) & 0x1) << 0)
 
 /*
  * Both low and high 16 bits are added as SIGNED additions, so if low 16 bits
@@ -359,16 +360,6 @@
 #define PPC_LI_MASK	0x03fffffc
 #define PPC_LI(v)	((v) & PPC_LI_MASK)
 
-/*
- * Only use the larx hint bit on 64bit CPUs. e500v1/v2 based CPUs will treat a
- * larx with EH set as an illegal instruction.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
-#define __PPC_EH(eh)	(((eh) & 0x1) << 0)
-#else
-#define __PPC_EH(eh)	0
-#endif
-
 /* Base instruction encoding */
 #define PPC_RAW_CP_ABORT		(0x7c00068c)
 #define PPC_RAW_COPY(a, b)		(PPC_INST_COPY | ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
-- 
2.36.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-02  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-02  9:02 [PATCH v1 1/3] powerpc: Fix eh field when calling lwarx on PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2022-08-02  9:02 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2022-08-02  9:02 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] powerpc: Make eh value more explicit when using lwarx Christophe Leroy
2022-08-02 18:13 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] powerpc: Fix eh field when calling lwarx on PPC32 Segher Boessenkool
2022-08-02 19:10 ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-13 22:38 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b9c8a1a14f9143552a85fcbf96698224a8c2469.1659430931.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).