From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDC2C4360C for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B5FC20B7C for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:28:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2B5FC20B7C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46ph3L0pyPzDqwf for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:27:58 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46ph1B4Xf8zDqv4 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:26:06 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9A6D56Z142676 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:26:03 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vhy6bg9j6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:26:03 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:26:01 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:25:58 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x9A6PvOQ51314848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:25:57 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E335204F; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:25:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.124.31.69] (unknown [9.124.31.69]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947D55205A; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:25:55 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes To: Christophe Leroy References: <20190925040630.6948-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> <19b222ce-3013-7de5-1c04-48c6fd00fe81@linux.ibm.com> <0d98e256-44ee-f920-cb2f-f79545584769@c-s.fr> <3e31e5f7-f948-512a-054c-9ad10103ccc0@linux.ibm.com> From: Ravi Bangoria Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:55:54 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3e31e5f7-f948-512a-054c-9ad10103ccc0@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19101006-0028-0000-0000-000003A8BCDF X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19101006-0029-0000-0000-0000246AC3D2 Message-Id: <8d0ad57b-72ad-b77c-d558-86b46982ddeb@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-10-10_03:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910100058 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ravi Bangoria , mikey@neuling.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 10/10/19 10:14 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote: > >>> @Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx? >>> >> >> Getting the following : >> >> root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak >> test: ptrace-hwbreak >> tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Fail >> failure: ptrace-hwbreak >> > > Thanks Christophe. I don't have any 8xx box. I checked qemu and it seems > qemu emulation for 8xx is not yet supported. So I can't debug this. Can > you please check why it's failing? PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG internally uses DAWR register and probably 8xx does not emulate DAWR logic, it only uses DABR to emulate double-word watchpoint. In that case, all testcases that uses PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG should be disabled for 8xx. I'll change [PATCH 5] accordingly and resend. Also, do you think I should fix hw_breakpoint_validate_len() from [PARCH 1] for 8xx? I re-checked you recent patch* to allow any address range size for 8xx. With that patch, hw_breakpoint_validate_len() won't get called at all for 8xx. * Message-Id: 1ed0de54ce6021fa0fdf50e938365546a4f5e316.1566925030.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr -Ravi