linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sahil Mehta <smehta@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] powerpc/pseries: Implement indexed-count hotplug memory remove
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:23:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9576c930-a87e-1d0c-e56b-7745d0b32137@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437ead25-8938-a0e8-c7cf-8ead45e5ef3b@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Indexed-count remove for memory hotplug guarantees that a contiguous block
of <count> lmbs beginning at a specified <index> will be unassigned (NOT
that <count> lmbs will be removed). Because of Qemu's per-DIMM memory
management, the removal of a contiguous block of memory currently
requires a series of individual calls. Indexed-count remove reduces
this series into a single call.

Signed-off-by: Sahil Mehta <smehta@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
v2:	-use u32s drc_index and count instead of u32 ic[]
	 in dlpar_memory
v3:	-add logic to handle invalid drc_index input
v4:	-none

 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |   90 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
index 2d4ceb3..dd5eb38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
@@ -503,6 +503,92 @@ static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_index(u32 drc_index, struct property *prop)
 	return rc;
 }

+static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_ic(u32 lmbs_to_remove, u32 drc_index,
+				     struct property *prop)
+{
+	struct of_drconf_cell *lmbs;
+	u32 num_lmbs, *p;
+	int i, rc, start_lmb_found;
+	int lmbs_available = 0, start_index = 0, end_index;
+
+	pr_info("Attempting to hot-remove %u LMB(s) at %x\n",
+		lmbs_to_remove, drc_index);
+
+	if (lmbs_to_remove == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	p = prop->value;
+	num_lmbs = *p++;
+	lmbs = (struct of_drconf_cell *)p;
+	start_lmb_found = 0;
+
+	/* Navigate to drc_index */
+	while (start_index < num_lmbs) {
+		if (lmbs[start_index].drc_index == drc_index) {
+			start_lmb_found = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		start_index++;
+	}
+
+	if (!start_lmb_found)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	end_index = start_index + lmbs_to_remove;
+
+	/* Validate that there are enough LMBs to satisfy the request */
+	for (i = start_index; i < end_index; i++) {
+		if (lmbs[i].flags & DRCONF_MEM_RESERVED)
+			break;
+
+		lmbs_available++;
+	}
+
+	if (lmbs_available < lmbs_to_remove)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < end_index; i++) {
+		if (!(lmbs[i].flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED))
+			continue;
+
+		rc = dlpar_remove_lmb(&lmbs[i]);
+		if (rc)
+			break;
+
+		lmbs[i].reserved = 1;
+	}
+
+	if (rc) {
+		pr_err("Memory indexed-count-remove failed, adding any removed LMBs\n");
+
+		for (i = start_index; i < end_index; i++) {
+			if (!lmbs[i].reserved)
+				continue;
+
+			rc = dlpar_add_lmb(&lmbs[i]);
+			if (rc)
+				pr_err("Failed to add LMB, drc index %x\n",
+				       be32_to_cpu(lmbs[i].drc_index));
+
+			lmbs[i].reserved = 0;
+		}
+		rc = -EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		for (i = start_index; i < end_index; i++) {
+			if (!lmbs[i].reserved)
+				continue;
+
+			pr_info("Memory at %llx (drc index %x) was hot-removed\n",
+				lmbs[i].base_addr, lmbs[i].drc_index);
+
+			lmbs[i].reserved = 0;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
 #else
 static inline int pseries_remove_memblock(unsigned long base,
 					  unsigned int memblock_size)
@@ -829,6 +915,10 @@ int dlpar_memory(struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog)
 		} else if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_INDEX) {
 			drc_index = hp_elog->_drc_u.drc_index;
 			rc = dlpar_memory_remove_by_index(drc_index, prop);
+		} else if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_IC) {
+			count = hp_elog->_drc_u.indexed_count[0];
+			drc_index = hp_elog->_drc_u.indexed_count[1];
+			rc = dlpar_memory_remove_by_ic(count, drc_index, prop);
 		} else {
 			rc = -EINVAL;
 		}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-01 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-01 17:19 [PATCH v4 0/2] powerpc/pseries: Implement indexed-count hotplug memory management Sahil Mehta
2016-08-01 17:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] powerpc/pseries: Implement indexed-count hotplug memory add Sahil Mehta
2016-08-02 20:19   ` Nathan Fontenot
2016-08-01 17:23 ` Sahil Mehta [this message]
2016-08-02 20:20   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] powerpc/pseries: Implement indexed-count hotplug memory remove Nathan Fontenot
2016-08-23 23:03   ` Michael Roth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9576c930-a87e-1d0c-e56b-7745d0b32137@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=smehta@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).