From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24D0C3A5A2 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C55F21881 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:17:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3C55F21881 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46NDD30SQZzDqlV for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 03:17:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46ND9N0GHnzDqWv for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 03:15:20 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46ND9M50DMz8vqL for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 03:15:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 46ND9M3x2Nz9sBF; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 03:15:19 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46ND9L6jRtz9sNk for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 03:15:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x83H2TeK103586 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 13:15:15 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2usujusstx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 13:15:15 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 18:15:13 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 3 Sep 2019 18:15:09 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x83HF84Y38273094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:15:08 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139444203F; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:15:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F90A42049; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:15:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.85.81.203] (unknown [9.85.81.203]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:15:05 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/31] pseries/fadump: define register/un-register callback functions To: Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev References: <156630261682.8896.3418665808003586786.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <156630269035.8896.2265146808387132419.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <87woepr5yn.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 22:45:04 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87woepr5yn.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19090317-0028-0000-0000-000003972DCF X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19090317-0029-0000-0000-000024597C72 Message-Id: <9663d9d4-1adf-a31d-cbe3-f48cc77e0a52@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-03_03:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1909030174 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Mahesh J Salgaonkar , Nicholas Piggin , Oliver , Vasant Hegde , Daniel Axtens Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 03/09/19 4:40 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Hari Bathini writes: >> Make RTAS calls to register and un-register for FADump. Also, update >> how fadump_region contents are diplayed to provide more information. > > That sounds like two independent changes, so can this be split into two > patches? Yeah. On splitting, the below hunk would look a bit different in this patch and the split patch would change it to how it looks now: > + seq_printf(m, "DUMP: Src: %#016llx, Dest: %#016llx, ", > + be64_to_cpu(fdm_ptr->rmr_region.source_address), > + be64_to_cpu(fdm_ptr->rmr_region.destination_address)); > + seq_printf(m, "Size: %#llx, Dumped: %#llx bytes\n", > + be64_to_cpu(fdm_ptr->rmr_region.source_len), > + be64_to_cpu(fdm_ptr->rmr_region.bytes_dumped)); - Hari