linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, anton@samba.org,
	paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 11/12] powerpc: Add a Kconfig and a function to set new soft_enabled mask
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 22:48:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fbb7a10-13a2-8542-2050-d73a958167d7@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160829114129.7e68c805@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>



On Monday 29 August 2016 07:11 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:07:27 +0530
> Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> New Kconfig is added "CONFIG_IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT" to add a warn_on
>> to alert the usage of soft_irq_set_mask() for disabling lower
>> bitmask interrupts.
>>
>> Have also moved the code under the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS in
>> arch_local_irq_restore() to new Kconfig as suggested.
>>
>> Patch also adds a new soft_irq_set_mask() to update paca->soft_enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/Kconfig              |  4 ++++
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c         |  4 ++--
>>   3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> index 927d2ab2ce08..878f05925340 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ config TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
>>   	bool
>>   	default y
>>   
>> +config IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT
>> +	bool
>> +	default n
>> +
>>   config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
>>   	bool
>>   	default y
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>> index 415734c07cfa..9f71559ce868 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>> @@ -81,6 +81,23 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_disable(void)
>>   	return flags;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static inline unsigned long soft_irq_set_mask(int value)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long flags, zero;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT
>> +	WARN_ON(value <= IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_LINUX);
>> +#endif
>> +	asm volatile(
>> +		"li %1,%3; lbz %0,%2(13); stb %1,%2(13)"
>> +		: "=r" (flags), "=&r" (zero)
>> +		: "i" (offsetof(struct paca_struct, soft_enabled)),\
>> +		 "i" (value)
>> +		: "memory");
>> +
>> +	return flags;
>> +}
> One other thing, if we have:
>
> local_irq_save(flags);              // disable LINUX mask -> LINUX
> local_irq_and_pmu_save(flags);      // disable PMU   mask -> LINUX|PMU
> local_irq_and_pmu_restore(flags);   // enable  PMU   mask -> LINUX
> local_irq_restore(flags);           // enable  LINUX mask -> NONE
>
> Then the nested code that re-enables PMUs will not replay PMU interrupt
> until the outer irq is re-enabled. I don't *think* this is a problem,
> but it probably should be commented.
>
> Which brings us to arch_local_irq_restore() (from another patch):
>
>
> @@ -208,7 +209,7 @@ notrace void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long en)
>
>   	/* Write the new soft-enabled value */
>   	set_soft_enabled(en);
> -	if (!en)
> +	if (en == IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_LINUX)
>   		return;
>   	/*
>   	 * From this point onward, we can take interrupts, preempt,
>
> I think this is a bit buggy for some cases of nested disables. For the
> above it is okay, but if we have:
>
> local_irq_and_pmu_save(flags);
> local_irq_and_pmu_save(flags);
> local_irq_and_pmu_restore(flags);
> local_irq_and_pmu_restore(flags);
>
>
> The first restore will restore LINUX|PMU mask, which will not be caught
> by this check.
>
> Testing instead for non-zero (any IRQ bits masked) should work. We should
> probably also add an IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT check to ensure LINUX bit is always
> one of the outer-most bits to be cleared (theoretically we could support

Just sent out the newer version of the patchset with most of the 
comments addressed.
But I am not sure about this comment. IIUC, will something like this 
will do?

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
index a02c6a3bc6fa..af0c08aefbcf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
@@ -209,6 +209,11 @@ notrace void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long en)
         unsigned char irq_happened;
         unsigned int replay;

+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DEBUG_SUPPORT
+       WARN_ONCE (en & (en & local_paca->soft_enabled),
+                  "soft_enabled transition to Unsupported state\n");
+#endif
+
         /* Write the new soft-enabled value */
         set_soft_enabled(en);

Maddy

> masking other bits without masking LINUX, but let's disallow that until a
> compelling use case shows up).
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-05 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-28 18:37 [RFC PATCH v4 00/12] powerpc: "paca->soft_enabled" based local atomic operation implementation Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/12] powerpc: Add #defs for paca->soft_enabled flags Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/12] powerpc: Cleanup to use IRQ_DISABLE_MASK_* macros for paca->soft_enabled update Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/12] powerpc: move set_soft_enabled() Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/12] powerpc: Use set_soft_enabled api to update paca->soft_enabled Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/12] powerpc: reverse the soft_enable logic Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/12] powerpc: Avoid using EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 macro in MASKABLE_* Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/12] powerpc: Add new _EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 macro Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/12] powerpc: Introduce new mask bit for soft_enabled Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/12] powerpc: Add "bitmask" paramater to MASKABLE_* macros Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/12] powerpc: Add support to mask perf interrupts and replay Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/12] powerpc: Add a Kconfig and a function to set new soft_enabled mask Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-29  0:23   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-29  1:41   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-29  5:58     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-05 17:18     ` Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]
2016-09-05 18:01       ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-09-07 12:39       ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-28 18:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/12] powerpc: rewrite local_t using soft_irq Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-29  1:15   ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9fbb7a10-13a2-8542-2050-d73a958167d7@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).