> On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote: >> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers >> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs >> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and >> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this >> cleanup to make code easier to read. > > Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but > changing the user ABI is not. This part: > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h >> index 264e266..e55d847 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h >> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char { >> >> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10) >> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11) >> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12) >> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13) >> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12) >> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13) > > means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be > broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever > acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the > patch. Hi Paul Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause. I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h` And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work, Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array Please suggest if this looks good Thanks Athira — diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c index 3f90eee261fc..b10bb404f0d5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c @@ -1679,10 +1679,13 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id, case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR: *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.uamor); break; - case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2: + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1: i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0; *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[i]); break; + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2: + *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[2]); + break; case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA: *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcra); break; @@ -1906,10 +1909,13 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id, case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR: vcpu->arch.uamor = set_reg_val(id, *val); break; - case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2: + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1: i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0; vcpu->arch.mmcr[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val); break; + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2: + vcpu->arch.mmcr[2] = set_reg_val(id, *val); + break; case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA: vcpu->arch.mmcra = set_reg_val(id, *val); break; — > > Regards, > Paul.