From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tasks stuck in futex code (in 3.14-rc6)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:25:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw8wSe-DUtZ8=rjFJzXYmOSsZ0JzS-_jsZKrDai8LZMXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395342510.14694.43.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> wrote:
>
> Oh, it does. This atomics technique was tested at a customer's site and
> ready for upstream.
I'm not worried about the *original* patch. I'm worried about the
incremental one.
Your original patch never applied to my tree - I think it was based on
-mm or something. So I couldn't verify my "let's go back to the
explicit 'waiters'" incremental patch against reverting and
re-applying the original patch.
So I'd like you to re-verify that that incremental patch really is
solid, and does what your original one did.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-20 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-19 15:26 Tasks stuck in futex code (in 3.14-rc6) Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-19 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-19 16:09 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-19 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-19 18:06 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 5:33 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-20 5:56 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 10:08 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-20 15:06 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 16:31 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 20:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-03-20 16:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-20 17:18 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-20 18:03 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-20 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-20 19:08 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 19:25 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2014-03-20 20:20 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-21 4:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-21 5:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-22 2:27 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-03-22 3:36 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-20 7:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-19 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+55aFw8wSe-DUtZ8=rjFJzXYmOSsZ0JzS-_jsZKrDai8LZMXw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).