From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE51C433B4 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF496105A for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:19:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5EF496105A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQ84g6gf0z30FQ for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:19:47 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=c8F4U79S; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31; helo=mail-yb1-xb31.google.com; envelope-from=jniethe5@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=c8F4U79S; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQ84B6MWSz2y0B for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:19:22 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id i4so8217105ybe.2 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:19:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XAZIHVdijUUGFo2ah07FxVug1uuGj3P2LI6gDVTxbFA=; b=c8F4U79SiV8zQ++PLmGCh9QD45RQqtZjXFREu1whB2ILdr/u7a1VIt+7Ae2EkYpFIm AmgS6RZ5cuDhi7Qp8iVDWV9vGWmiR4QiX/xeEpYR3SHG03e60G7p+wxUMchlMbIHfc9a SnUcJGGCaeZqYCOn2aespGM4VLXdb6/Mt1027CRReRsxTbM0CFGQAOFSWPLtDL51ZlxR sNf0yoZRSYSFHAvVNYajB10X9Y8pn3hiuvujk4neFfkEr4ofKo/nrWlgIACVwLqLUQ+i gydZ00GwhTmCPLPP5vRJk6lgGv496x9Opv85Y2HqB5jA6il0KOma0lZ6ZKZPqsrqzLFC opDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XAZIHVdijUUGFo2ah07FxVug1uuGj3P2LI6gDVTxbFA=; b=LzAQza48v6uOY/kjpsDG+I9R/KW9NltbEn+KPSXn2UaDpa2SaMTg0vXCyND4kTa16o erqKbZRFxPT3zM3HdoYYg/c+I0p1TlTMeFS7qgtEebNtf7rXUW4UkYyd+lC6nRmGay45 5s6cq65cQexpWOEAjGEbq0Rtn9qJMapOIMR1VpA2kfSV0XeJodtyDsOE6lDI7YmL4I6S 6JKPjDavsLf9WEvJWFxUfMX+cPygMidF7UMRh+y/tqBi6BKaivf+s4AbbJy60DMoB5h1 PbZ5PGyy05HQ3Jjoj11raLrEP8hcZTh6zrvMVErCKV96ubaskUzzqTQRvGnDHTSTrriS DeiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531iu7i+H5HT40RqwnZHWS8k4dJ6e749eyOgJnWS6B1SvRLSlt0F nEacKLHKDykP2LLIvu6Lk/M07gqE9R+VllxJOPc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwF8y/VaW5w6GhlSVmSRE/XyKJ/+Sw57IhMI1DV8jH1npKTGp6qLLwgyggkvXUc0rFrZgE5+wkMhRMn4fsmLZE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:124a:: with SMTP id t10mr16058068ybu.386.1618982360609; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:19:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210330045132.722243-1-jniethe5@gmail.com> <20210330045132.722243-2-jniethe5@gmail.com> <87czve7h8r.fsf@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <87czve7h8r.fsf@linux.ibm.com> From: Jordan Niethe Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:19:09 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/10] powerpc/mm: Implement set_memory() routines To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ajd@linux.ibm.com, Nicholas Piggin , cmr@codefail.de, naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev , Daniel Axtens Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 3:37 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > Jordan Niethe writes: > > > From: Russell Currey > > > > The set_memory_{ro/rw/nx/x}() functions are required for STRICT_MODULE_RWX, > > and are generally useful primitives to have. This implementation is > > designed to be completely generic across powerpc's many MMUs. > > > > It's possible that this could be optimised to be faster for specific > > MMUs, but the focus is on having a generic and safe implementation for > > now. > > > > This implementation does not handle cases where the caller is attempting > > to change the mapping of the page it is executing from, or if another > > CPU is concurrently using the page being altered. These cases likely > > shouldn't happen, but a more complex implementation with MMU-specific code > > could safely handle them, so that is left as a TODO for now. > > > > On hash the linear mapping is not kept in the linux pagetable, so this > > will not change the protection if used on that range. Currently these > > functions are not used on the linear map so just WARN for now. > > > > These functions do nothing if STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is not enabled. > > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens > > Signed-off-by: Russell Currey > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy > > [jpn: -rebase on next plus "powerpc/mm/64s: Allow STRICT_KERNEL_RWX again" > > - WARN on hash linear map] > > Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe > > --- > > v10: WARN if trying to change the hash linear map > > --- > > arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 + > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/set_memory.h | 32 ++++++++++ > > arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile | 2 +- > > arch/powerpc/mm/pageattr.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/set_memory.h > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/mm/pageattr.c > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > index fc7f5c5933e6..4498a27ac9db 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > > @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ config PPC > > select ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_CALLBACKS > > select ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_SYNC_CORE > > select ARCH_HAS_SCALED_CPUTIME if VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE && PPC_BOOK3S_64 > > + select ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY > > select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX if ((PPC_BOOK3S_64 || PPC32) && !HIBERNATION) > > select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST > > select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/set_memory.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/set_memory.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..64011ea444b4 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/set_memory.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > > +#ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_SET_MEMORY_H > > +#define _ASM_POWERPC_SET_MEMORY_H > > + > > +#define SET_MEMORY_RO 0 > > +#define SET_MEMORY_RW 1 > > +#define SET_MEMORY_NX 2 > > +#define SET_MEMORY_X 3 > > + > > +int change_memory_attr(unsigned long addr, int numpages, long action); > > + > > +static inline int set_memory_ro(unsigned long addr, int numpages) > > +{ > > + return change_memory_attr(addr, numpages, SET_MEMORY_RO); > > +} > > + > > +static inline int set_memory_rw(unsigned long addr, int numpages) > > +{ > > + return change_memory_attr(addr, numpages, SET_MEMORY_RW); > > +} > > + > > +static inline int set_memory_nx(unsigned long addr, int numpages) > > +{ > > + return change_memory_attr(addr, numpages, SET_MEMORY_NX); > > +} > > + > > +static inline int set_memory_x(unsigned long addr, int numpages) > > +{ > > + return change_memory_attr(addr, numpages, SET_MEMORY_X); > > +} > > + > > +#endif > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile > > index 3b4e9e4e25ea..d8a08abde1ae 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile > > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > > > > ccflags-$(CONFIG_PPC64) := $(NO_MINIMAL_TOC) > > > > -obj-y := fault.o mem.o pgtable.o mmap.o maccess.o \ > > +obj-y := fault.o mem.o pgtable.o mmap.o maccess.o pageattr.o \ > > init_$(BITS).o pgtable_$(BITS).o \ > > pgtable-frag.o ioremap.o ioremap_$(BITS).o \ > > init-common.o mmu_context.o drmem.o > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pageattr.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..9efcb01088da > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pageattr.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > + > > +/* > > + * MMU-generic set_memory implementation for powerpc > > + * > > + * Copyright 2019, IBM Corporation. > > + */ > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > + > > +/* > > + * Updates the attributes of a page in three steps: > > + * > > + * 1. invalidate the page table entry > > + * 2. flush the TLB > > + * 3. install the new entry with the updated attributes > > + * > > + * This is unsafe if the caller is attempting to change the mapping of the > > + * page it is executing from, or if another CPU is concurrently using the > > + * page being altered. > > + * > > + * TODO make the implementation resistant to this. > > + * > > + * NOTE: can be dangerous to call without STRICT_KERNEL_RWX > > + */ > > +static int change_page_attr(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr, void *data) > > +{ > > + long action = (long)data; > > + pte_t pte; > > + > > + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock); > > + > > + /* invalidate the PTE so it's safe to modify */ > > + pte = ptep_get_and_clear(&init_mm, addr, ptep); > > + flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE); > > + > > + /* modify the PTE bits as desired, then apply */ > > + switch (action) { > > + case SET_MEMORY_RO: > > + pte = pte_wrprotect(pte); > > + break; > > + case SET_MEMORY_RW: > > + pte = pte_mkwrite(pte); > > + break; > > + case SET_MEMORY_NX: > > + pte = pte_exprotect(pte); > > + break; > > + case SET_MEMORY_X: > > + pte = pte_mkexec(pte); > > + break; > > + default: > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, ptep, pte); > > + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +int change_memory_attr(unsigned long addr, int numpages, long action) > > +{ > > + unsigned long start = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PAGE_SIZE); > > + unsigned long sz = numpages * PAGE_SIZE; > > + > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX)) > > + return 0; > > What restrictions imposed by that config are we dependent on here? So the reasons given here https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200226062403.63790-9-ruscur@russell.cc/ were: " - The linear mapping is a different size and apply_to_page_range() may modify a giant section, breaking everything - patch_instruction() doesn't know to work around a page being marked RO, and will subsequently crash " but now I'm not 100% sure about it... we might not actually need to have that restriction. > > > > + > > + if (numpages <= 0) > > + return 0; > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!radix_enabled() && > > + get_region_id(addr) == LINEAR_MAP_REGION_ID)) { > > + return -1; > > + } > > +#endif > > What about VMEMMAP_REGIOND_ID True. > > > + > > + return apply_to_existing_page_range(&init_mm, start, sz, > > + change_page_attr, (void *)action); > > > That handles on 64K mapping. What about linear map? Also there is a > patchset implementing hugepage for vmalloc mapping. At least for now there is nothing that calls the set memory functions on the linear map. Is that this series: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20210317062402.533919-15-npiggin@gmail.com/ ? I will test on top of that. > > > +} > > -- > > 2.25.1