From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82942C433EF for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 19:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J48cD3rHbz3cTn for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 06:42:04 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=209.85.219.49; helo=mail-qv1-f49.google.com; envelope-from=pku.leo@gmail.com; receiver=) Received: from mail-qv1-f49.google.com (mail-qv1-f49.google.com [209.85.219.49]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J48bg6zfrz305j for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 06:41:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-qv1-f49.google.com with SMTP id j9so22746217qvm.10 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 11:41:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bjDuMIeNukQm5l61QJg6nNUANP6Dica4CrK7FOgg6ks=; b=ZpSueGKYxp5cZLTRJhwAgnj5bXz2AdvU94HCePUb7m0L/cxbz2BUevN5xub0TyPrGm 54sB2nhbtdbjX6OnBRlpqYsjQrhzJI1BrrOSbuJU+T62lpxC8r5oXaPZ3oBdhLYCQMzx eAZS7/W3YUF1T/mnKUzu4CsraH2nWZEt5FG7CRo72nKpNGgJO4hCEAOb1sJRj5slbnds 1yLMy2s6ck5iFqEnKpykcB6OQ7oHZT5RulE0ywteXE35bHw92ZfQOdQHnc0AI2Ztm93n pksOGq4H9E40UZ7SYFwesvIWgBdAu5iEb5jvLNYqcsTstUg1yBWfrFyy9TyrXqAvCWN3 XAKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323uzuOR0CixWYVQ9QXQqcjebTVex+v/V2BbgyE1GjuZBYel8yg 8XTn/+OqkNbThp6fj7JD3eQGQ0A9wdE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJRqexARs7xtsBoARVpX1TVMfu0v+e/IyFdWT+GERIfafsvQp7vLNwN/6k3MuyqYrbjB6N6g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2c5:: with SMTP id g5mr8593539qvu.109.1638387690369; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 11:41:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk1-f176.google.com (mail-qk1-f176.google.com. [209.85.222.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s4sm386586qko.47.2021.12.01.11.41.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Dec 2021 11:41:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id m192so32285025qke.2 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 11:41:29 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:298e:: with SMTP id r14mr8391905qkp.509.1638387689177; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 11:41:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211110105952.62013-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20211110105952.62013-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Li Yang Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:41:16 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] soc: fsl: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions To: Andy Shevchenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Qiang Zhao Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:32 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:38:01AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:24:36PM +0000, Leo Li wrote: > > > > From: Andy Shevchenko > > > > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 5:30 AM > > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:59:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > > v2: updated Cc list based on previous changes to MAINTAINERS > > > > > > > > Any comments on this, please? > > > > > > > > I really want to decrease amount of kernel.h usage in the common headers. > > > > So others won't copy'n'paste bad example. > > > > > > There seems to be no problem with the patch although I didn't get time to really compile with it applied. > > > > > > Will pick them up later after build test. > > > > Thank you! > > > > Note, it has two fixes against MAINTAINERS which may be sent, I believe, > > sooner than later to Linus. > > Any new so far? The build test is good. I have applied it for next. Thanks. Regards, Leo