From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-x242.google.com (mail-it0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3vsndm4WPkzDqd1 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:47:08 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-it0-x242.google.com with SMTP id y18so2490170itc.2 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 03:47:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170328092103.GQ6986@localhost.localdomain> References: <1490691532-2086-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> <1490691532-2086-3-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> <20170328092103.GQ6986@localhost.localdomain> From: Daniel Baluta Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:47:04 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: imx-wm8962: Fix codec_clk cleanup To: Charles Keepax Cc: Daniel Baluta , Nicolin Chen , Mark Brown , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Timur Tabi , Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Liam Girdwood , Takashi Iwai , fabio.estevam@nxp.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:58:52AM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: >> Resource managed devm_clk_get only works with platform's device dev. >> > > I feel like this could use an explaination of why not using devm > is the correct fix, rather than just using the platform device > for the call. Its not obvious to me, that using the platform > device would be an issue. Hi Charles, I see where the confusion comes from :) and I thought the explanation is obvious from the code, see inline comments. Would an explanation like the one below, work better? " We cannot use devm_clk_get with &codec_dev->dev device because the kernel uses pdev->dev to free the managed resources, so we will end up with a leaking codec_clk reference" >> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int imx_wm8962_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> goto fail; >> } pdev->dev from here: >> >> - codec_clk = devm_clk_get(&codec_dev->dev, NULL); >> + codec_clk = clk_get(&codec_dev->dev, NULL); is different from &codec_dev->dev. >> if (IS_ERR(codec_clk)) { >> ret = PTR_ERR(codec_clk); >> dev_err(&codec_dev->dev, "failed to get codec clk: %d\n", ret); >> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ static int imx_wm8962_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> } >> >> data->clk_frequency = clk_get_rate(codec_clk); >> + clk_put(codec_clk); >> >> data->dai.name = "HiFi"; >> data->dai.stream_name = "HiFi"; thanks, Daniel.