linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/15] PCI/ACPI: clean up acpi_pci_root_create()
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:23:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iCgQxxuoCB9B4-Ho3xeLwb4v99Xyw-9e-tT53mRD+YVQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180817102645.3839621-8-arnd@arndb.de>

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:33 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> The acpi_pci_create_root_bus() can be fully integrated into
> acpi_pci_root_create(), improving a few things:
>
> * We can call pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(), which registers and
>   scans the bridge in one step.
> * After a failure in pci_register_host_bridge(), we correctly
>   clean up the resources.
> * The bridge settings (release function, flags, operations etc)
>   can get set up before registering the bridge.
> * Further cleanup would be possible, removing duplication between
>   pci_host_bridge and some ACPI structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 68 +++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 85dbcf47015b..5f73de3b67c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -873,34 +873,6 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_release_info(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>         __acpi_pci_root_release_info(bridge->release_data);
>  }
>
> -static struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> -               struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources)
> -{
> -       int error;
> -       struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> -
> -       bridge = pci_alloc_host_bridge(0);
> -       if (!bridge)
> -               return NULL;
> -
> -       bridge->dev.parent = parent;
> -
> -       list_splice_init(resources, &bridge->windows);
> -       bridge->sysdata = sysdata;
> -       bridge->busnr = bus;
> -       bridge->ops = ops;
> -
> -       error = pci_register_host_bridge(bridge);
> -       if (error < 0)
> -               goto err_out;
> -
> -       return bridge->bus;
> -
> -err_out:
> -       kfree(bridge);
> -       return NULL;
> -}
> -
>  struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
>                                      struct acpi_pci_root_ops *ops,
>                                      struct acpi_pci_root_info *info,
> @@ -909,8 +881,7 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
>         int ret, busnum = root->secondary.start;
>         struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
>         int node = acpi_get_node(device->handle);
> -       struct pci_bus *bus;
> -       struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
> +       struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;

Why "bridge" and not "host" or even something to stand for "root complex"?

Or maybe it can still be "host_bridge"?

>
>         info->root = root;
>         info->bridge = device;
> @@ -930,30 +901,39 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
>
>         pci_acpi_root_add_resources(info);
>         pci_add_resource(&info->resources, &root->secondary);
> -       bus = acpi_pci_create_root_bus(NULL, busnum, ops->pci_ops,
> -                                 sysdata, &info->resources);
> -       if (!bus)
> +
> +       bridge = pci_alloc_host_bridge(0);
> +       if (!bridge)
>                 goto out_release_info;
>
> -       host_bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(bus->bridge);
> +       list_splice_init(&info->resources, &bridge->windows);
> +       bridge->sysdata = sysdata;
> +       bridge->busnr = busnum;
> +       bridge->ops = ops->pci_ops;
> +       pci_set_host_bridge_release(bridge, acpi_pci_root_release_info,
> +                                   info);
> +
>         if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
> -               host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 0;
> +               bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 0;
>         if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
> -               host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 0;
> +               bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 0;
>         if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL))
> -               host_bridge->native_aer = 0;
> +               bridge->native_aer = 0;
>         if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL))
> -               host_bridge->native_pme = 0;
> +               bridge->native_pme = 0;
>         if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL))
> -               host_bridge->native_ltr = 0;
> +               bridge->native_ltr = 0;
> +
> +       ret = pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(bridge);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               goto out_release_bridge;
>
> -       pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> -       pci_set_host_bridge_release(host_bridge, acpi_pci_root_release_info,
> -                                   info);
>         if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
> -               dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &bus->dev, "on NUMA node %d\n", node);
> -       return bus;
> +               dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &bridge->bus->dev, "on NUMA node %d\n", node);
> +       return bridge->bus;
>
> +out_release_bridge:
> +       pci_free_host_bridge(bridge);
>  out_release_info:
>         __acpi_pci_root_release_info(info);
>         return NULL;
> --
> 2.18.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-20  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-17 10:26 [RFC 00/15] PCI: turn some __weak functions into callbacks Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 01/15] PCI: clean up legacy host bridge scan functions Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 02/15] PCI: move pci_scan_bus into callers Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 03/15] PCI: move pci_scan_root_bus " Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 04/15] PCI: export pci_register_host_bridge Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 05/15] PCI: move pci_create_root_bus into callers Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 06/15] powerpc/pci: fold pci_create_root_bus into pcibios_scan_phb Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 07/15] PCI/ACPI: clean up acpi_pci_root_create() Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-20  8:23   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-08-20 11:19     ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-20 11:24       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-20 11:36         ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 08/15] x86: PCI: clean up pcibios_scan_root() Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-20  8:31   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-20 11:16     ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-20 11:26       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 09/15] PCI: xenfront: clean up pcifront_scan_root() Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 10/15] sparc/PCI: simplify pci_scan_one_pbm Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 11/15] PCI: hyperv: convert to pci_scan_root_bus_bridge Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 12/15] PCI: make pcibios_bus_add_device() a callback function Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 13/15] PCI: turn pcibios_alloc_irq into a callback Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 14/15] PCI: make pcibios_root_bridge_prepare " Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-17 10:26 ` [RFC 15/15] PCI: make pcibios_add_bus/remove_bus callbacks Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-21  6:14 ` [RFC 00/15] PCI: turn some __weak functions into callbacks Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-21 10:07   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-21 11:30   ` David Woodhouse
2018-08-21 13:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-02 20:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0iCgQxxuoCB9B4-Ho3xeLwb4v99Xyw-9e-tT53mRD+YVQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).