From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31921C4360F for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5830D2075E for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 06:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xX3/HJVi" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5830D2075E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44SP7v5xTWzDqHS for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:12:59 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.91; helo=conssluserg-06.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xX3/HJVi"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conssluserg-06.nifty.com (conssluserg-06.nifty.com [210.131.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44SP5z4c6JzDqDy for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:11:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mail-vk1-f175.google.com (mail-vk1-f175.google.com [209.85.221.175]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-06.nifty.com with ESMTP id x2P6B3L2021923 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:11:04 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-06.nifty.com x2P6B3L2021923 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1553494264; bh=M5yB2IL6rUVfb6KdDylKlG225AGtoW93SAI13OU0scI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=xX3/HJVi67ZE7O+YgUqY300T00eUjNmJmXP8bCXfoQHa5Air4JM6GFt/6oBaczpj/ u11TINIB7G2truNMRO5GcWSbfQSL1zf1IeAED2pmVCAzEPfwkett3y4nd6iZ8G0rHD gDwKNHBAnpvcqHz+cUlBgFdd2Dt3ZqYf/800h8o4bipHysPCxBBgReoo84esXAs2tE v3YifwN1shxb3mR95hOrNLP5oiGOjTO08WNyZOUo6iwL49DbeCPGekShiCb62o+ahl JdPg0gXqHCc2MEe1FgcA9Dnz0Zr7qfil5TTERII2lmrZR2L0Qb27qhVxDYEF1d632b o0O0IBkTWJ30Q== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.221.175] Received: by mail-vk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id k64so1699573vke.1 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 23:11:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXXzYxQRvKwy1eaZCPTKnNmhrJi9yOLLrmKzyEEQb2Y+tK0FNTV 9FolkHKsuLaBQrCfO4Hx6+LFMqKba9sxZQFJC2M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8qUhdfpRv8vBpRrajP0ICg/lHdRAAg6gG/ToNJOJ/LPtsBzM8huHn1TCODJl7fUVHytYK1YSBZrnQ8QJK2r0= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9350:: with SMTP id v77mr13352129vkd.84.1553494263012; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 23:11:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1553062828-27798-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>

In-Reply-To: From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:10:27 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler: allow all arches to enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING To: Arnd Bergmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch , linux-s390 , Dave Hansen , the arch/x86 maintainers , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Burton , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev , Linux ARM Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi Arnd, On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:34 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:41 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > I've added your patch to my randconfig test setup and will let you > > know if I see anything noticeable. I'm currently testing clang-arm32, > > clang-arm64 and gcc-x86. > > This is the only additional bug that has come up so far: > > `.exit.text' referenced in section `.alt.smp.init' of > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.o: defined in discarded section > `exit.text' of drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.o > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h > index 201100226301..84b12e33104d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ void convert_to_tag_list(struct tag *tags); > const struct machine_desc *setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, > unsigned int machine_nr); > #else > -static inline const struct machine_desc * > +static __always_inline const struct machine_desc * > setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, unsigned int machine_nr) > { > early_print("no ATAGS support: can't continue\n"); > I do not know why to reproduce it, but is "__init __noreturn" more sensible than "__always_inline" here? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada