From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=AYvg=P2=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBEFC07EBF
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:36:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13EE520657
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:36:10 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 13EE520657
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43hB5459ZZzDrBf
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 06:36:08 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
 (client-ip=209.85.160.193; helo=mail-qt1-f193.google.com;
 envelope-from=arndbergmann@gmail.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de
Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com (mail-qt1-f193.google.com
 [209.85.160.193])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43hB2H5R49zDrCl
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 06:33:43 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id l12so16459670qtf.8
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:33:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=ErLXt+4MLir6MBRid1biQgec4eSYhQQBJKNsrW9q3Fs=;
 b=Won9ezj8kN7+PpjlKwriVM1+nGiKYBN63IYOdAem+GuhPIIahEtDZl0jHRtWhgV6+W
 ymu5IOb1MO/UDjTEp5rhif64kJ965lmqn//0HLiTDllHCcKT8chTjxlGqafDNKIpOvor
 SIq/Cw8SXDrlLr2HiI6fANuhve5xrZhHGQqFuZ2/oxJo6/Ez4a6C5YI82LWgbFXZ6CPC
 A7Y5x8pqv2KhJZrf2O81DbRLX+WzvSUVYgCkqQdsqjEr+ubAdM7ZoIxF+xKSRK0jcQmU
 PrzMIHvgA43wn4lTNFHKyoRsMHaFA3kUj3ni9ycpvws8X3qq1rzAiycyc4eNHBIKGA4m
 ue2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfEK3L+peg2MuIPBCzoktZGl3ejoGipI9IsG7DJ2/gltb9PuNWN
 K94y1aEwJDAymCCrdru5820qufuG/s9TOoUOCfE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN51ZSz8S/UEkmKkQ76yrnTrRmtVHEOrjwWqzHKH/uRWMtRP1y/XgFacGAOrjnX1tIv/Wxgb87NR61MktkAeKK4=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f50c:: with SMTP id j12mr16647911qvm.149.1547840021534; 
 Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:33:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de>
 <CALCETrXqM5mhvwreN5y-9K99h1j9rs9MAVK-cNLC54s1fdHA6w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXqM5mhvwreN5y-9K99h1j9rs9MAVK-cNLC54s1fdHA6w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:33:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0V+xboaGAF2nqrYtpjXXA7y0LcvCKi4ngLTus1D_XZBA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/29] y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit
 architectures
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
 Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
 Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
 Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
 Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
 sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
 linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
 linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
 y2038 Mailman List <y2038@lists.linaro.org>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
 X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org>,
 Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
 Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
 linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
 linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
 Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
 Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
 Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
 "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
 alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
 Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
 linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 7:50 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 8:25 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > - Once we get to 512, we clash with the x32 numbers (unless
> >   we remove x32 support first), and probably have to skip
> >   a few more. I also considered using the 512..547 space
> >   for 32-bit-only calls (which never clash with x32), but
> >   that also seems to add a bit of complexity.
>
> I have a patch that I'll send soon to make x32 use its own table.  As
> far as I'm concerned, 547 is *it*.  548 is just a normal number and is
> not special.  But let's please not reuse 512..547 for other purposes
> on x86 variants -- that way lies even more confusion, IMO.

Fair enough, the space for those numbers is cheap enough here.
I take it you mean we also should not reuse that number space if
we were to decide to remove x32 soon, but you are not worried
about clashing with arch/alpha when everything else uses consistent
numbers?

       Arnd