linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver <oohall@gmail.com>
To: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/64: Adjust order in pcibios_init()
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:31:57 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOSf1CFezjdgu1idFXmGoXUof0kPyAFcii30MMXXiuoVj0mJ7w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222032320.GA4334@tungsten.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:24 PM Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> After some consideration, I've decided to post a v2 of this patch that
> will make it a bit safer (although I haven't seen any problems with it)
> and make it a little easier to refactor some of the EEH code that
> interacts with the hooks.

Can you be a little more specific?

> Cheers,
> Sam.
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 04:14:42PM +1100, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> > The pcibios_init() function for 64 bit PowerPC currently calls
> > pci_bus_add_devices() before pcibios_resource_survey(), which seems
> > incorrect because it adds devices and attempts to bind their drivers
> > before allocating their resources (although no problems seem to be
> > apparent).
> >
> > So move the call to pci_bus_add_devices() to after
> > pcibios_resource_survey().
> >
> > This will also allow the ppc_md.pcibios_bus_add_device() hooks to
> > perform actions that depend on PCI resources, both during rescanning
> > (where this is already the case) and at boot time, which should
> > support improvements and refactoring.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I've tested this on a P9 for both the host and a KVM guest, and the change
> > hasn't caused any differences in PCI resource assignments or the general boot
> > messages.
> >
> > I've also had a go at inspecting most of the code used by pci_bus_add_devices()
> > and pcibios_resource_survey() and it doesn't look like there are going to be
> > any changes in behaviour caused by reordering.  It might be worth mentioning
> > that the hotplug path (see pcibios_finish_adding_to_bus()) already does
> > resource allocation before calling pci_bus_add_devices().
> >
> > However, it would be great if someone could test this change on some older
> > hardware or comment on wether we should make the same change on 32 bit machines.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sam.
> >
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c | 8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> > index 9d8c10d55407..1ce28888dbdb 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> > @@ -58,14 +58,16 @@ static int __init pcibios_init(void)
> >       pci_add_flags(PCI_ENABLE_PROC_DOMAINS | PCI_COMPAT_DOMAIN_0);
> >
> >       /* Scan all of the recorded PCI controllers.  */
> > -     list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) {
> > +     list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node)
> >               pcibios_scan_phb(hose);
> > -             pci_bus_add_devices(hose->bus);
> > -     }
> >
> >       /* Call common code to handle resource allocation */
> >       pcibios_resource_survey();
> >
> > +     /* Add devices. */
> > +     list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node)
> > +             pci_bus_add_devices(hose->bus);
> > +
> >       printk(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Probing PCI hardware done\n");
> >
> >       return 0;
> > --
> > 2.19.0.2.gcad72f5712
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-22  4:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-14  5:14 [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/64: Adjust order in pcibios_init() Sam Bobroff
2019-02-15  0:46 ` Oliver
2019-02-22  3:23 ` Sam Bobroff
2019-02-22  4:31   ` Oliver [this message]
2019-02-22  5:33     ` Sam Bobroff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOSf1CFezjdgu1idFXmGoXUof0kPyAFcii30MMXXiuoVj0mJ7w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).