linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@canonical.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vio: use simple dummy struct device as bus parent
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:48:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOZ2QJNNnkM_0ZTULHOYGY2wEz1GxZWzHjosnM=j98zxZXUvYA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190927181856.GD1804168@kroah.com>

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 2:19 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:04:02AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > The dummy vio_bus_device creates the /sys/devices/vio directory, which
> > contains real vio devices under it; since it represents itself as having
> > a bus = &vio_bus_type, its /sys/devices/vio/uevent does call the bus's
> > .uevent function, vio_hotplug(), and as that function won't find a real
> > device for the dummy vio_dev, it will return -ENODEV.
> >
> > One of the main users of the uevent node is udevadm, e.g. when it is called
> > with 'udevadm trigger --devices'.  Up until recently, it would ignore any
> > errors returned when writing to devices' uevent file, but it was recently
> > changed to start returning error if it gets an error writing to any uevent
> > file:
> > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/97afc0351a96e0daa83964df33937967c75c644f
> >
> > since the /sys/devices/vio/uevent file has always returned ENODEV from
> > any write to it, this now causes the udevadm trigger command to return
> > an error.  This may be fixed in udevadm to ignore ENODEV errors, but the
> > vio driver should still be fixed.
> >
> > This patch changes the arch/powerpc/platform/pseries/vio.c 'dummy'
> > parent device into a real dummy device with no .bus, so its uevent
> > file will stop returning ENODEV and simply do nothing and return 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 11 ++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> > index 79e2287991db..63bc16631680 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> > @@ -32,11 +32,8 @@
> >  #include <asm/page.h>
> >  #include <asm/hvcall.h>
> >
> > -static struct vio_dev vio_bus_device  = { /* fake "parent" device */
> > -     .name = "vio",
> > -     .type = "",
> > -     .dev.init_name = "vio",
> > -     .dev.bus = &vio_bus_type,
> > +static struct device vio_bus = {
> > +     .init_name      = "vio",
>
> Eeek, no!  Why are you creating a static device that will then be
> reference counted?  Not nice :(

sorry!  I'll admit that I simply copied what drivers/base/platform.c
seemed to be doing.

>
> What's wrong with a simple call to device_create() for your "fake"
> device you want to make here?  That's what it is there for :)

ack, will send a new patch using that.  thanks!

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-29 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-27 13:04 [PATCH] powerpc/vio: use simple dummy struct device as bus parent Dan Streetman
2019-09-27 18:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-09-27 19:48   ` Dan Streetman [this message]
2019-09-28  7:41     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-09-28 13:28       ` Dan Streetman
2019-10-03 19:10   ` Dan Streetman
2019-10-03 19:21     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOZ2QJNNnkM_0ZTULHOYGY2wEz1GxZWzHjosnM=j98zxZXUvYA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ddstreet@canonical.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).