linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, scottwood@freescale.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] serial: make bugs field not specific to 8250 type uarts.
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 20:32:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP=VYLpn7kJJ6we3diqhCR+QzjQtzTmkEzSP-uw07=udJKYK6g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111202005150.2e9fde43@bob.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Make the bugs field part of the globally visible struct
>> uart_port and remove the 8250 specific one.
>
> Except all the bits in it are 8250 specific things or names that are
> meaningless in generic form - no. I also don't want to encourage flags
> and bug bits. We already have too many and its making the code a mess.
> So right now we want less not more.

The bits in "bugs" are only passed through -- the idea is that there is
no "interpretation" of them by any generic layer -- only that they prop
from the arch down to the driver which knows what they mean.

I can understand the "want less not more" mentality -- I was thinking
the same thing when I was looking at the replication of fields between
uart_port and uart_8250_port, and toying with the idea of helping clean
that up....  (separate topic, to be sure.)

If you have an idea in mind how arch/platform code should cleanly
pass data about known uart bugs to the uart driver, then let me know
what you have in mind.  I've no real attachment to what I proposed
here -- it just happened to be the solution I thought would be the least
offensive.  If there is a better idea floating around, I'll go ahead and
try to implement it.

Thanks,
Paul.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" i=
n
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at =A0http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-02  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-01 23:47 [PATCH 0/3] RFC Fix Fsl 8250 BRK bug via letting plat code set bugs Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] serial: make bugs field not specific to 8250 type uarts Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-02  0:51   ` Alan Cox
2011-12-02  1:32     ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2011-12-02 11:49       ` Alan Cox
2011-12-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] serial: allow passing in hardware bug info via platform device Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] 8250: add workaround for MPC8[356]xx UART break IRQ storm Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-01 23:51   ` Scott Wood
2011-12-02  0:05     ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-02  0:17       ` Kumar Gala
2011-12-02 11:30         ` Alan Cox
2011-12-02 16:34           ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-02 17:27             ` Scott Wood
2011-12-02  0:57   ` Alan Cox
2011-12-02  1:42     ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-04 23:42 ` [PATCH 0/6] RFCv2 Fix Fsl 8250 BRK bug Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-04 23:42   ` [PATCH 1/6] serial: move struct uart_8250_port from 8250.c to 8250.h Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-04 23:42   ` [PATCH 2/6] serial: clean up parameter passing for 8250 Rx IRQ handling Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-04 23:42   ` [PATCH 3/6] serial: export the key functions for an 8250 IRQ handler Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-04 23:42   ` [PATCH 4/6] serial: make 8250 timeout use the specified " Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-04 23:42   ` [PATCH 5/6] serial: manually inline serial8250_handle_port Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-04 23:42   ` [PATCH 6/6] serial: add irq handler for Freescale 16550 errata Paul Gortmaker
2011-12-05 12:18   ` [PATCH 0/6] RFCv2 Fix Fsl 8250 BRK bug Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAP=VYLpn7kJJ6we3diqhCR+QzjQtzTmkEzSP-uw07=udJKYK6g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).