From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742F8C33CB1 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCA3206D9 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="k2BorqGR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CFCA3206D9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47z7t16tZCzDqbD for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:49:29 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::e44; helo=mail-vs1-xe44.google.com; envelope-from=ulf.hansson@linaro.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=k2BorqGR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-vs1-xe44.google.com (mail-vs1-xe44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47z7qW44vFzDqYB for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:47:14 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-vs1-xe44.google.com with SMTP id u14so12955837vsu.3 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:47:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=e8GCNZcg16saTrMZk9XDpdMaVZPA9De2RuDrXztHKIQ=; b=k2BorqGRv1qecoewrZRof15MBjeX/nLBmpC89UNAKjqBpUv+vsGetaEEc4jezRDpdc tlj4QgYXN3P22IEUxfsuDvBx37inTng/nxtGxBE0uDgAkYoys5WL44o6fJBqJZKzADl/ wRsNZ7d3SnQ+tO4x9wkExC9KeBWArdwGKnMYfESx1zC0Sc1O6zgxDycMQ72JyMIGlqPc 7tbyenglNkIrRS7BtwiS2TxSU0yE+SG+E1GdWaQol11w/7wje3jRk8+fbtn3OnpY54Ie IbXpyQGy3tsPShbYWkAtOaOEHLh1RdWdaDJ1WEzaNuE1xOK7wydpA2OwNRJEGqTP5Ca9 ewng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=e8GCNZcg16saTrMZk9XDpdMaVZPA9De2RuDrXztHKIQ=; b=hvCJZXU/vKTg+oMarDWy5BWlmjh+ofCxNuN2FTcrVlufgIodwI0Kn6/9GhJCPLqcxB wp2cvYeC7UNy3tP9XA38zz03JjHBPpnDAaPm1hE+69yxDQ9oCekbiCPPiMo90ciD6qwd ash8gespA8sbOuI3JqPEM8uTv3y79EIXdWzflWveRTLGhwc3h0nyZf/OhCQuby9uUy9X V3ETDGyUWyWoT8FlOpe3DypvydrFQKK32kTVPXTzVKFJBBaK3h3QTnXAdMRu6NUUHVfc yL9IdqAmPQf/6ZNmYRI3qFtV7pxUoOZxsWdZKkIQuYW/eizMQF7TPAmV2uFWAZRXjEMB o0Hg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXkHa4Eo8uTWK1FLLsuG5dBEcg326TmgroaEiyZUeofMMwTZ88q cQKQSimw0uS8FGrDlwH+er2KBOPtYmkKlM+g5WdKSg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyuDnkVyDWBsgR/JhVT3EpQFHRk0GcoPe4/kJeb0QWiOtiYIF2f+u6CXLSRJ5THanvBhvUpWQ7nIc+twQygCcY= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e9da:: with SMTP id q26mr1979547vso.34.1579189628280; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:47:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200108093903.57620-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20200108093903.57620-2-hdegoede@redhat.com> <61bc9265-ece0-eeb6-d4a1-4631138ecf29@intel.com> <8d67882d-04a8-0607-be4e-c1430b7fda21@redhat.com> <84a32714-ba08-74a0-0c76-3c36db44dd68@intel.com> <93446e09-5f12-800a-62fa-bf3ecea7273d@redhat.com> <399ac7d5-2518-799a-595e-f6b6878cf4ab@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ulf Hansson Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:46:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FSL P5020 P5040 PPC] Onboard SD card doesn't work anymore after the 'mmc-v5.4-2' updates To: Christian Zigotzky Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Darren Stevens , mad skateman , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Julian Margetson , "contact@a-eon.com" , "R.T.Dickinson" , linuxppc-dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:18, Christian Zigotzky wrote: > > Hi All, > > We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card interface > [1,2]. Could you please add this patch to the tree? No, because according to previous discussion that isn't the correct solution and more importantly it will break other archs (if I recall correctly). Looks like someone from the ppc community needs to pick up the ball. > > Thanks, > Christian > > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg56211.html I think this discussion even suggested some viable solutions, so it just be a matter of sending a patch :-) > [2] > http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?f=58&t=4349&start=20#p49012 > Kind regards Uffe