From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71E3C433E0 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 02:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 417C12177B for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 02:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="jIn5HYif" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 417C12177B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BN86n1tnwzDqvW for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 12:13:53 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=jIn5HYif; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BN84l0XWLzDqsZ for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 12:12:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0772149k009865; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:12:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=pp1; bh=VXljsUSqKdMZUfG4LefmGHTN/HjAin0NYssO1OfIiJw=; b=jIn5HYifyI193iK/ItfkqBP5XCfapDNeQTggs1eBMDMnIavnhAH/vO/l5CMNGrx0DoZO VGSKaG13nU1jd7okEUtedHxUfClrNuod6VJabvl1IpSfgIjC/ZED0c7QVEoRcvqYt2wa uCGaJUCCtdB0zlgkOxLK9bd4HnDJwwhy5g+9Kn5mJtO/+ddzCB3BQHCrYJFAt1PNclnN wsrgkmWdK5Hmi5Jbf0/q3/+HzKrpnYmqnJwcLxCJEXW46p6nZPHrfYNTI/eLF48CUKtu ADdsbq09Bf1LKNYXFPB6/nSGHENmorPUKb8Ir8BcQKr+wuw6O7YAiwk648vCA4MzPY0p CA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32r9wuea5f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:12:01 -0400 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 07722NQs013793; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:12:01 -0400 Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32r9wuea4u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:12:00 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07726LB8032201; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 02:11:59 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 32n01863j4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Aug 2020 02:11:59 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0772ATfi43909516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 02:10:29 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C83FA4062; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 02:11:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBAAA4060; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 02:11:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.77.207.131] (unknown [9.77.207.131]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 02:11:53 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc From: Athira Rajeev In-Reply-To: <20200806122052.GC71359@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 07:41:51 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1595870184-1460-1-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <27D1CE26-A506-4CFF-B1C2-E0545F26E637@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200730195048.GA1484375@krava> <20200806122052.GC71359@kernel.org> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-06_17:2020-08-06, 2020-08-06 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=914 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008070010 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ravi Bangoria , Michael Neuling , maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kajoljain , linuxppc-dev , Jiri Olsa , Jiri Olsa Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" > On 06-Aug-2020, at 5:50 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo = wrote: >=20 > Em Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:04:14PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu: >>=20 >>=20 >>> On 31-Jul-2020, at 1:20 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:24:40PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>> On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:46 PM, Athira Rajeev = wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Patch set to add support for perf extended register capability in >>>>> powerpc. The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used = to >>>>> indicate the PMU which support extended registers. The generic = code >>>>> define the mask of extended registers as 0 for non supported = architectures. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Patches 1 and 2 are the kernel side changes needed to include >>>>> base support for extended regs in powerpc and in power10. >>>>> Patches 3 and 4 are the perf tools side changes needed to support = the >>>>> extended registers. >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Hi Arnaldo, Jiri >>>>=20 >>>> please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions on this = patch series to add support for perf extended regs. >>>=20 >>> hi, >>> can't really tell for powerpc, but in general >>> perf tool changes look ok >>>=20 >>=20 >> Hi Jiri, >> Thanks for checking the patchset. >=20 > So I'dd say you submit a v6, split into the kernel part, that probably > should go via the PPC arch tree, and I can pick the tooling part, ok? >=20 > - Arnaldo Sure Arnaldo, I will send a v6. Thanks, Athira=