From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEB4C43331 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D835C2075B for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nxp.com header.i=@nxp.com header.b="S/UMbi/8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D835C2075B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nxp.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BQ5V2hj8zF314 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:08:14 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com (client-ip=40.107.0.84; helo=eur02-am5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; envelope-from=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nxp.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nxp.com header.i=@nxp.com header.b="S/UMbi/8"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr00084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.0.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47BQ3M65dSzF43G for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:06:19 +1100 (AEDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ADTfuy7yYb3Z7BvLnYWqg7eyFOVLTsKnHd44Ix5xyJqXA6ZwDCIDjdbgsRGe4Duq5GYYzHF0kgZAKISMCOwuemXSKkavxePNV8zUuk6B4IA3QOQKjUnJr/+iZw3fgnukeBoBoIYueWQdMRZFEUh7lYlXLJ+X9cXHvtxNctOOyoXuIVEMYkXB161Y5mWqnbTbD/EdC7WrNZYAsLcRC4p9/esywYIhiN9vrSQdlDAcU7Ds2ER0D8aYRY/w5ikzv3IUJq8MymIsHuHfY7qauAbXGFeIPExlGLN7fFwqhYJy/1ekBNaGKFbFKWi+dBGFZk7QNg1y2w96rpP+9IbkrSdyvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=jqfhLy15q3DKXp1ZpKfv6q73du1gcBDOB0dOCiIhhPk=; b=ken2ReQtxJvnk/sqZlxUZE0quTdFsYbG8V6BdktBG2K01sG7hH5qQslVdCHrcFITvEiT5Q8M81Vn1ja8wsIK3h6lkec4F4wHFsik531Fh1A76D0AyJg/alJBmP+ElWWuifBeMG2+8rTNhGkRpICPvVs9IQxCngnCm/aBLrSMsae7lTX1fVTx0RP8kaLJ+sbGUhoNQ9qSI8c1dGDeotymMMjqD5wfziAyOyOdckC77RRI7Ra5+qe+6abOsFZZpXFi/qLh1HKb+6c2gULUu3V+B4Tag7+X3bx84lTEM2lwQJnA2/D9mVyN+QY1WjtSQk/FBFRm1wzWZUBGYwUM0AxdTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nxp.com; dkim=pass header.d=nxp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nxp.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=jqfhLy15q3DKXp1ZpKfv6q73du1gcBDOB0dOCiIhhPk=; b=S/UMbi/8wpmqGX0e8l8iRdvYB4Va5xSo0BAjQoww/v8L0GaVbRHVpi1BVdKXP89aQvkI3B6X89B5EFYN031nxAEpjVHDAY9VWqemes/tkijN6+AK0y41vJ42YKq1XUer8wql5lOJem3S7RFJj8429kVmWvrcwfeUyx+JUhUStlY= Received: from VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (20.179.232.225) by VE1PR04MB6350.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (20.179.234.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2430.20; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:06:07 +0000 Received: from VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9c38:e113:f0b4:f9]) by VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9c38:e113:f0b4:f9%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2430.027; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:06:07 +0000 From: "S.j. Wang" To: Rob Herring , "nicoleotsuka@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_asrc: add compatible string for imx8qm Thread-Topic: [alsa-devel] [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_asrc: add compatible string for imx8qm Thread-Index: AdWYbsgh8IXPoWIwTOytoNQoYAeMEw== Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:06:07 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [119.31.174.66] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 432c21f6-3686-4758-eb6a-08d7668663a2 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1PR04MB6350: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219; x-forefront-prvs: 0218A015FA x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(199004)(189003)(186003)(54906003)(6436002)(86362001)(305945005)(55016002)(66446008)(6116002)(66066001)(66946007)(66476007)(66556008)(76116006)(102836004)(256004)(14444005)(316002)(74316002)(64756008)(6246003)(71200400001)(71190400001)(229853002)(110136005)(478600001)(25786009)(81156014)(7736002)(6506007)(2501003)(7696005)(81166006)(9686003)(26005)(14454004)(33656002)(99286004)(7416002)(2906002)(4326008)(476003)(8936002)(5660300002)(8676002)(52536014)(486006)(3846002)(32563001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VE1PR04MB6350; H:VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: BMjPrC9cSAkLC4vh8ygCcYEwlGhUbDiqnwOVMVgkjkGIXfnjaJLYLt8I4byQVqypxZ7a8wNhNGCD1x50bVnO0vP0bbv3to3jwgdylNed1xpLJ1l1xuP20Dq8xDZA2Hv/BpmZ1Kv+Eq4wCeJPFq4W3H3bgpfa0J576SYvRGmYcNOnUrJQmV6ZS3+t4hFSfZpNgiwZS44lhWdFCcL9E0eQxmDGHCFipQaLXAU+id5NWtcGXh7H0azL/U/fIsbhng9Nl/HLx+OMDhzCb1uebGRxTxMjsHdQVsZIsqAjXaCwWyKb8iVCQ3VQQlK8Nl6V2ObFmpXtBVYkilJJskLI+Bb/8SIhx874Ehefo/OfNnBlvX03NHIKpEGjDUOpNK5p5MbUtyokvizJaYfkPKa9UWy9PRp7Q6b52RLAYTQLzUiUa8eJjkso73VP6miTRQJ7c5h0 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 432c21f6-3686-4758-eb6a-08d7668663a2 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Nov 2019 09:06:07.7967 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: h1eigLkZycDyuWu2wlZigzxo89NFLzDid4DGzCpsE5reZ8qaEyJp+XdRB/+vq9tVgn7QdxUc3VCBHXvEPzuU4g== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1PR04MB6350 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "timur@kernel.org" , "Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com" , "festevam@gmail.com" , "tiwai@suse.com" , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "nicoleotsuka@gmail.com" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi Rob, Nicolin >=20 > Hi Rob > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 07:41:26PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > > > In order to support the two asrc modules in imx8qm, we need to add > > > compatible string "fsl,imx8qm-asrc0" and "fsl,imx8qm-asrc1" > > > > Are the blocks different in some way? > > > > If not, why do you need to distinguish them? > > > The internal clock mapping is different for each module. >=20 > Or we can use one compatible string, but need add another property > "fsl,asrc-clk-map" to distinguish the different clock map. >=20 > The change is in below. >=20 > Which one do you think is better? >=20 > Required properties: >=20 > - - compatible : Contains "fsl,imx35-asrc" or "fsl,imx53-asrc". > + - compatible : Contains "fsl,imx35-asrc", "fsl,imx53-asrc", > + "fsl,imx8qm-asrc". >=20 > - reg : Offset and length of the register set f= or the device. >=20 > @@ -35,6 +36,11 @@ Required properties: >=20 > - fsl,asrc-width : Defines a mutual sample width used by DPCM Back > Ends. >=20 > + - fsl,asrc-clk-map : Defines clock map used in driver. which is req= uired > + by imx8qm > + <0> - select the map for asrc0 > + <1> - select the map for asrc1 > + > Optional properties: >=20 I will do a update for this change in v3. Best regards Wang shengjiu