From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1AEC5DF62 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 443032173E for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nxp.com header.i=@nxp.com header.b="TmPGAP/3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 443032173E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nxp.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477NfC5jjXzF5rj for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 21:52:35 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=permerror (SPF Permanent Error: Void lookup limit of 2 exceeded) smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com (client-ip=2a01:111:f400:fe1e::603; helo=eur01-he1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; envelope-from=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nxp.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nxp.com header.i=@nxp.com header.b="TmPGAP/3"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01on0603.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe1e::603]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 477Nc60h5SzF5qd for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 21:50:43 +1100 (AEDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=b1THa4ENgGt5zeS5PUnngWUk6tvLAIe+Bh8K5psJ516yNjkQj6cC10ZFnatU6nX5idUSole5ClT3dD4iHe4iQ1/85/zq1PN011XyHoYmVrcEG3oguvVPdhyK2JBsoZZGdSxncj6UIFQ9LaOvXdikQ3zYhgEqXGFTxxnxqbZ5Ftc6ovpLikMR1DMBf8vFqDiPFx9J0xDrk3+A4qOfk/d6We8V5+1utmEX+MIqU6Jwy+c+bkWdFiBZWSJ+BCyPOmLK5voyvwVn8ilexYTQeKcdQcWqAoQc7WGtNaUIQNmKh21iZ8XJbLRMmRuO4dfDD30bGNkHqJr5GncoMNG7zWTvww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=V0QX3C80PD91klugzd+I0gq7rm8l0f4Q8ArIqfdx/C8=; b=kGT7XzeT7fL/ufeic2MJ7xEJMrpeHFPLQzcDzkzMZYpxbFgBK6SP14LFOQ7DPJxmOLsmzaqG70CyhwMKZHYyyr2k16KDGT5NUJUHe4DUbhBFUzyRVInej6NTLRu2k9+J7/F6SNEIxSPx1sisBmBwlgZ0OMLuNsnLlB0MewZHOlc78NYWt9k6s34JZ0/vmH0Pnv4a+kBqt6YhVdvi1ezFC1o7aXV+wBtyIph2romHwxNBFNxOgN1Fw4NEXU83GBve2j0d54UGtoWtv8EtnlrAU32FBzMjOyeHCmvCnB8Klem6AuRb4fOe6ekSBqpHBYR7EHNH6GMsmyNdC16mvmtPbw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nxp.com; dkim=pass header.d=nxp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nxp.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=V0QX3C80PD91klugzd+I0gq7rm8l0f4Q8ArIqfdx/C8=; b=TmPGAP/3idjE4UU+VwcUc5yRgY2BZEqQX+GbvY7zNAnQ6oIHjhJjkjNZenlRbAsxANTwnv3cKnhNsA43PakTCJiLNVdEH7kIZVF9mFn4kLxrUt2kyCdu3XY5evxYfw8lQWeed36UQaoo4eGBtvsfLJqxbJNGjChuds6xNHi+67c= Received: from VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (20.179.232.225) by VE1PR04MB6383.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (20.179.232.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2430.22; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:50:35 +0000 Received: from VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9c38:e113:f0b4:f9]) by VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9c38:e113:f0b4:f9%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2408.024; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:50:35 +0000 From: "S.j. Wang" To: "S.j. Wang" , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_asrc: add compatible string for imx8qm Thread-Topic: [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_asrc: add compatible string for imx8qm Thread-Index: AdWUjzC3wwj9eI6oTXKcjGy6eTmZpg== Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:50:34 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [119.31.174.66] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e20ddbff-caba-4f8f-18ba-08d762a72715 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1PR04MB6383:|VE1PR04MB6383: x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6430; x-forefront-prvs: 02135EB356 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(396003)(346002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(478600001)(229853002)(14454004)(99286004)(8936002)(26005)(186003)(3846002)(6116002)(4326008)(25786009)(66066001)(316002)(110136005)(256004)(2906002)(14444005)(7416002)(54906003)(71190400001)(305945005)(7696005)(74316002)(81156014)(7736002)(66476007)(66946007)(66556008)(6506007)(52536014)(66446008)(64756008)(33656002)(6436002)(102836004)(76116006)(5660300002)(9686003)(55016002)(6246003)(486006)(8676002)(476003)(86362001)(71200400001)(81166006)(32563001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VE1PR04MB6383; H:VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: s59rthG3RgI8klH72jKE9UQW2witPfrZ5abu8SsjwMNQziZtZpINIpL93pU30kCJH3hhvmtRSB/TLzmI1OMJTLUgw/GTmupj6ae0qJ30LXe+A1de6aigo/2Urc89Q8y/eOmvveTHCN9YWcW0oifDqB0b12brr5LYpTpiKvv0twbt8q39ZYk2JpAKVkQDvJAo7+jDB4tQTDnOa+76u45LNoPMcnO+Onf+EOs5SVQlvRfNtqJdZ8qHij9kr54WOVNUwpMLSJYvBNKw+QvQfvjggbCe67VJz1SnhqqgS0dlt8MfilFTXYk113R/2MHrTUZQikozZR4NvcYey7GsmK31xOWwsqHfZcgPk2IPpovqHos+Vcsk5w0isloUbSL5V2oB8M6CALL3VBj00t8u5YW+b5PcJMjtx/UxKj+ObDYJhPxXihDdgdbSju81fpqLkQmX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e20ddbff-caba-4f8f-18ba-08d762a72715 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Nov 2019 10:50:35.0239 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: wpRZHb+9dP0mkVSdFJZYBzmev3k+MOBzUVELZF9clE5pEyJUUi9WcYMjj79mAFqBheAQslvwwMeZ7n2Blkcixg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1PR04MB6383 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "timur@kernel.org" , "Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com" , "festevam@gmail.com" , "tiwai@suse.com" , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "nicoleotsuka@gmail.com" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi Rob >=20 > Hi > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 07:41:26PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > > > In order to support the two asrc modules in imx8qm, we need to add > > > compatible string "fsl,imx8qm-asrc0" and "fsl,imx8qm-asrc1" > > > > Are the blocks different in some way? > > > > If not, why do you need to distinguish them? > > > The internal clock mapping is different for each module. >=20 Or we can use one compatible string, but need add another property "fsl,asrc-clk-map" to distinguish the different clock map. The change is in below. Which one do you think is better?=20 Required properties: - - compatible : Contains "fsl,imx35-asrc" or "fsl,imx53-asrc". + - compatible : Contains "fsl,imx35-asrc", "fsl,imx53-asrc", + "fsl,imx8qm-asrc". - reg : Offset and length of the register set for= the device. @@ -35,6 +36,11 @@ Required properties: - fsl,asrc-width : Defines a mutual sample width used by DPCM Back E= nds. + - fsl,asrc-clk-map : Defines clock map used in driver. which is requi= red + by imx8qm + <0> - select the map for asrc0 + <1> - select the map for asrc1 + Optional properties: Best regards Wang shengjiu