From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B751C433FE for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MvDPF3Q35z3dwh for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 06:02:41 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=cmREGR46; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com (client-ip=192.55.52.120; helo=mga04.intel.com; envelope-from=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=cmREGR46; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MvDNB1b2Nz3brh for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 06:01:44 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1666378906; x=1697914906; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KEST6tJWT2v7gvYlEM0LvQZkO/ctHEeheF3BY2Di7TQ=; b=cmREGR46jMlgcrUOQJDedDHRM3SRpB9UE6I8nN5O/N0LRIgJgyDCTMCw CFJUGN/i+aKSAdIePDOs0HG3viZhkIVdU/tGfAcXDUsgDRC3Sf0E/wv51 4kXzpoEuSDyFmyn5pHms5/gToidJir6BQWVXksHhJ33wcOk4souScmpQk Zd/tc1YsyWLdb2wKs7Sir9gfOStGETgN8vrmjyua7s+wvHFSZ/uvxV9XT FSc/7wMR0GMaueveoHgJRrhFJlu7l/TMhAAmGn0WKu4Vw6NIiipaGLTIw PIw9Xm8tOxuTSD5GxS7XTPhOqJu+xP7vt6HZ7myvBD95Xmnr1Nlp2vtGz Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10507"; a="305815049" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,202,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="305815049" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Oct 2022 12:01:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10507"; a="959756321" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,202,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="959756321" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2022 12:01:36 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1olxGw-0009M9-1o; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 22:01:34 +0300 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 22:01:34 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] gpiolib: more cleanups to get rid of of_node Message-ID: References: <20221005152947.71696-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221005152947.71696-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Scally , Li Yang , Sakari Ailus , Heikki Krogerus , Qiang Zhao Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 06:29:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > One more user outside of GPIO library and pin control folders needs > to be updated to use fwnode instead of of_node. To make this easier > introduce a helper in property.h and convert the user. > > Note, the helper will be useful not only for the current users, > but any future ones that want to replace of_device_is_compatible() > with analogous fwnode API. > > Changelog v2: > - placed new helper correctly in the property.h Any comments on the series? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko