From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72FFFFA3743 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N1qj74q2yz3ccl for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:54:19 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=pwFUNTan; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=145.40.68.75; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=wsa@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=pwFUNTan; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4N1qh75Xthz2xl5 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:53:27 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A66B0B81D0C; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6BCEC433D6; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:53:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1667307202; bh=//Hxv4m5/4QFRxQRfAon0gk4J4k+/YkMxoNhB+9hSjw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pwFUNTanDEt0f8mjmDDpk4NWrcYo9Qn4x5XD5ockyCaqypHBIdKaVZ+14azUWPgpn hMjvkwEzWCtqs46Aet/E0rWrEjF7iZIc8xCakHca3Qvn+VV0OOmFYGgRWwhaw+69Dg LwmcaI03269wCwnQfr5NQv1sen/dHOnzrSTt7vvccQ57Ewg9/w2GZYTCGADBk4vunj +iIE/iEpKcrcxV7ZklHDvKeVRfM2Eu6EMuCsh3ngxn1hD22d2GM+eXGWuvLumv9/ho V1NAE6YQ8UPSWU9gvgqd4THWN4omXnkkVegA/TzD/3WTw4ppprmal9bSnZEmXbegZw FAJIKc0TpYNFw== Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 13:53:18 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Sven Peter Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i2c/pasemi: PASemi I2C controller IRQ enablement Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Sven Peter , Arminder Singh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, asahi@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alyssa Rosenzweig , Hector Martin , Christophe Leroy , Nicholas Piggin , Michael Ellerman References:

MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NW2sLPhekt1Tv84F" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alyssa Rosenzweig , Hector Martin , Nicholas Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arminder Singh , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, asahi@lists.linux.dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" --NW2sLPhekt1Tv84F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > + complete(&smbus->irq_completion); >=20 > I only realized just now that you also want to disable the interrupt > right here by writing to IMASK. This is a level sensitive interrupt at > AIC level so the moment this handler returns it will fire again until > you reach the write above after the completion wait a bit later. This seems like a valid request. Any chance for a v4? We are so close to being good here... --NW2sLPhekt1Tv84F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmNhFr4ACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZTiw/8Dlg4oKc1MA8MC7mHzNw8On6Tqi9U92KfEJWvk2wK99rdh41lCyBayYdB 4NCFrJeY+Nqu90Buf4Ui2rVom01pPSd9guyDZ+YAyxd+uLSlfrD8R6vCjLbWbXPo V0SSN0+POvYYZ5XLE5ASIU3MlIMCAYV/+ZgOesqjD7LyraOIcSvt+nEVe7y0BDFX qDR2LxOZMo512FVzjoloyGicjbhGbbMBm0Xmo4QKWv5RBmxbZIebuEbqnoibtzEe VXFGULpQt9wJ+q+Tw1S12uKnrV1ds8qX614A1uILui6he0WaX92mIxiN9FGROGaB t/0vqarPj6zTgmD7JhQLDtxqZcxjzJSE2mMX4ied6NC1zi1H6NFatxyIg7gCLS5b hlYlhVk2x8IjeCnaeGfrtczmQSSK71xMi34RhS+Ohyic3PG/xWfOUMqDuI2Glfx1 IwkrTaR+WQwb9TJEnH7peybHATPjmeZHG8mC+VlH9c4vtSRXNq8JYXtH+hLCN8kb vJuHvbsXFpe0NZGCm4gT12g4UhJTM/nVwBxO89j7wmETdf9AMxAMStUepUQpxd4w M4q0zgnAwT+iSz1qCRO2LT+84J0LH+tV6zfH+NfysoSnjPG+Gi3Ke9RWqJeEME3T MzPj6d88/qFAMcwN9L9eewvRncGBSqpqBQcSYEBTnEmrVNSZEto= =tAGC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NW2sLPhekt1Tv84F--