From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9A4C433EF for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 10:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7196060EE3 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 10:11:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 7196060EE3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HRLSW6XRbz3c7l for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 21:11:39 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=vG7tFpqb; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=wsa@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=vG7tFpqb; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HRLRn0yK9z2xsC for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 21:11:01 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CA4E60F11; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 10:10:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1633774259; bh=I6yMirQXjiY0IGJ/jzB5Ca8tnIUYDvJKAySCD1HCIys=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vG7tFpqbwu5nzsyK8zmVciBzlw+Ez+Bh6JWj3b8nvaw8Q7D8FRtysS7kh/YDjXRSk o/VmqAB3y8SNX473asU8TMujwhARhh2dgDP6Gm4e7e7NbibXdDo/nfr5KuaF2v2bqt fsoidYBXlSlGq+Pz9VICbkAUre058xEY+ymAZ8CAZ0+k65fKaEH1l6pRCwZaLqM65i XGABgvwrV0+DrWg4xk4tDerAEYrAgcqnB7IRBWHjx66WgZg+MM0woGFjp4cxJLzl2C xvJ5sTX2pJoW0sCUzsud5ZZKnXDzgP4v7vWusyurnTaXLBa7LYKE3bs1/mFSnp+4PM aobz952pw9C4g== Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 12:10:55 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Sven Peter Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Add Apple M1 support to PASemi i2c driver Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Sven Peter , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Olof Johansson , Christian Zigotzky , Arnd Bergmann , Hector Martin , Mohamed Mediouni , Stan Skowronek , Mark Kettenis , Alyssa Rosenzweig , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211008163532.75569-1-sven@svenpeter.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AjEJq1EXRZyEzc7Y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211008163532.75569-1-sven@svenpeter.dev> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Hector Martin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Christian Zigotzky , Olof Johansson , Mohamed Mediouni , Mark Kettenis , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alyssa Rosenzweig , Stan Skowronek Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" --AjEJq1EXRZyEzc7Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > I still don't have access to any old PASemi hardware but the changes from > v1 are pretty small and I expect them to still work. Would still be nice > if someone with access to such hardware could give this a quick test. Looks good to me. I will wait a few more days so that people can report their tests. But it will be in the next merge window. --AjEJq1EXRZyEzc7Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmFhaq8ACgkQFA3kzBSg Kba+5RAAoKYeWy96McCs12xbnzgzEDhLea9/Qt4ptal6FD4k1Qd9Aq8jbnOBxYqd OP1eWehepNLlQoVW9MpQ/mwL/bZH617rm0lXyZ3i0l3cRJ7TYx1VpKsAqqktS5cL cLpzs0T9CKohcAnpUzmHCG/K6DhIMJM+dprDvW2cGWEtKfNAkhsiJ9jr+fdywfuR 3rrbxvTnVgRO5urI6NJcgtGmTmZBn4bCsnOLeeYyOQmqEgUQ5uyl++cPqdJppxS8 lCUqrKUuVsRWDqyxqbanNd0rlUtaqH4w8BemMqGmiqKSe5w7getSlJWRCKSFOQNu yYNdu2WSlyQFKBfPbCswE39GnhHh+4Bz6yanjCCEtwZWbkPWLfnpHshpiUAwiBRQ MzGFEY3G9TgguV/Vukstmi5mX9TcaiocSAMg830b4b49GS1J05nOSfDP87wIpm7H Ce61h5Jb764YCn27DqGodeAx+2sQGMcgyDxtIrEHogI3Sf4ZnKRm8iGnf9Z/dtx9 7ZPQcpFkyBbalinYTD/3WuMqhxZZt2otdyawwQ3ZsqUT31BhUEMwp7yCzIctw+N7 OpV6at+8YcjJtALKdvhn6H/HfriIdz9xu1EoSKKQ3t9NSLmAcJk8mcAUAnXdIulM N4WQk8q9PSxkkbsocy6Gr2MixXjxwji1442g0L5CBh/2TcbvLsM= =GqIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AjEJq1EXRZyEzc7Y--