From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C89C433F5 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CEA861263 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:39:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8CEA861263 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Htgy768TZz2yw1 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 20:39:43 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com (client-ip=134.134.136.100; helo=mga07.intel.com; envelope-from=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com; receiver=) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Htgxh1mMlz2xC6 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 20:39:19 +1100 (AEDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10169"; a="297081778" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,238,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="297081778" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2021 01:38:11 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,238,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="494394187" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.184]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2021 01:38:09 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1mmuuf-007NGY-M1; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:38:01 +0200 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:38:01 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Leo Li Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] soc: fsl: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions Message-ID: References: <20211110105952.62013-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20211110105952.62013-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Qiang Zhao Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:24:36PM +0000, Leo Li wrote: > > From: Andy Shevchenko > > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 5:30 AM > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:59:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > > v2: updated Cc list based on previous changes to MAINTAINERS > > > > Any comments on this, please? > > > > I really want to decrease amount of kernel.h usage in the common headers. > > So others won't copy'n'paste bad example. > > There seems to be no problem with the patch although I didn't get time to really compile with it applied. > > Will pick them up later after build test. Thank you! Note, it has two fixes against MAINTAINERS which may be sent, I believe, sooner than later to Linus. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko