From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF6CC433EF
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:03:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy9XL5RCpz3cTJ
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:03:14 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=ilmpEja/;
	dkim-atps=neutral
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record)
 smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133;
 helo=bombadil.infradead.org;
 envelope-from=batv+86effef50fc3f8a1c567+6749+infradead.org+hch@bombadil.srs.infradead.org;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key;
 secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256
 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=ilmpEja/; 
 dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org
 [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy9Wf0r53z2xD4
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:02:38 +1100 (AEDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version
 :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=sdZnUMzq4+z5JAUxazcphNdGaICd1jOM0lzfsOlGGP4=; b=ilmpEja/277DxKyEOCWtwolukQ
 TPjFvPd+06Duh+vtGjhRV7kysY6QfnRhDUQM2LPMmQJPp0CcDS7ZITxDjyFmd5QuKSeULHTzQv/dY
 64hhQASYsNjqn2sxQ8pG09hu68ESlQPBP+ZUUGQuXU+5Zf2NM0DQ50AjfVah1yfzmf28PCovqXoHo
 BshQ9GNqU4Vd+l0inCSwLOM/Kv9mqXQWM0bcy2OkcRImPWSvuzdM6R2QSbW7WDXWrev49VJC5rIfa
 zjELqfCR0DFOQ+1CmCyyesRY7ojy5sRUvp347Q343uxXWWK10wDz2za7INHW8lBnzV6aVrB5MveY8
 5H/+OeNA==;
Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red
 Hat Linux)) id 1nJejt-00GFoH-Dz; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:02:13 +0000
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:02:13 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition
Message-ID: <YgqLFYqIqkIsNC92@infradead.org>
References: <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd@kernel.org>
 <20220214163452.1568807-5-arnd@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220214163452.1568807-5-arnd@kernel.org>
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by
 bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, dalias@libc.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
 jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, guoren@kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
 linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org,
 linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, deller@gmx.de, x86@kernel.org,
 linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, mingo@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org,
 linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
 arnd@arndb.de, hca@linux.ibm.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, richard@nod.at, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
 openrisc@lists.librecores.org, green.hu@gmail.com, shorne@gmail.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
 tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 dinguyen@kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
 akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
 davem@davemloft.net
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 05:34:42PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> +#define __range_not_ok(addr, size, limit)	(!__access_ok(addr, size))
> +#define __chk_range_not_ok(addr, size, limit)	(!__access_ok((void __user *)addr, size))

Can we just kill these off insted of letting themm obsfucate the code?