From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
mingo@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, kernellwp@gmail.com, jgross@suse.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, dave@stgolabs.net,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:19:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6026a0c-9ad8-5025-c616-eb33f96e91ce@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115154706.GF11311@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
在 2016/11/15 23:47, Peter Zijlstra 写道:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 05:08:33AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
>> index 0f400c0..38c3bb7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
>> @@ -310,6 +310,8 @@ struct pv_lock_ops {
>>
>> void (*wait)(u8 *ptr, u8 val);
>> void (*kick)(int cpu);
>> +
>> + bool (*vcpu_is_preempted)(int cpu);
>> };
>
> So that ends up with a full function call in the native case. I did
> something like the below on top, completely untested, not been near a
> compiler etc..
>
Hi, Peter.
I think we can avoid a function call in a simpler way. How about below
static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
{
/* only set in pv case*/
if (pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted)
return pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
return false;
}
> It doesn't get rid of the branch, but at least it avoids the function
> call, and hardware should have no trouble predicting a constant
> condition.
>
> Also, it looks like you end up not setting vcpu_is_preempted when KVM
> doesn't support steal clock, which would end up in an instant NULL
> deref. Fixed that too.
>
maybe not true. There is .vcpu_is_preempted = native_vcpu_is_preempted when we define pv_lock_ops.
your patch is a good example for any people who want to add any native/pv function. :)
thanks
xinhui
> ---
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
> @@ -673,6 +673,11 @@ static __always_inline void pv_kick(int
> PVOP_VCALL1(pv_lock_ops.kick, cpu);
> }
>
> +static __always_inline void pv_vcpu_is_prempted(int cpu)
> +{
> + PVOP_VCALLEE1(pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted, cpu);
> +}
> +
> #endif /* SMP && PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ struct pv_lock_ops {
> void (*wait)(u8 *ptr, u8 val);
> void (*kick)(int cpu);
>
> - bool (*vcpu_is_preempted)(int cpu);
> + struct paravirt_callee_save vcpu_is_preempted;
> };
>
> /* This contains all the paravirt structures: we get a convenient
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ static inline void queued_spin_unlock(st
> {
> pv_queued_spin_unlock(lock);
> }
> +
> +#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
> +static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> +{
> + return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
> +}
> #else
> static inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> {
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -26,14 +26,6 @@
> extern struct static_key paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled;
> static __always_inline bool static_key_false(struct static_key *key);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
> -#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
> -static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> -{
> - return pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
>
> /*
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> @@ -415,15 +415,6 @@ void kvm_disable_steal_time(void)
> wrmsr(MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME, 0, 0);
> }
>
> -static bool kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> -{
> - struct kvm_steal_time *src;
> -
> - src = &per_cpu(steal_time, cpu);
> -
> - return !!src->preempted;
> -}
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> static void __init kvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
> {
> @@ -480,9 +471,6 @@ void __init kvm_guest_init(void)
> if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME)) {
> has_steal_clock = 1;
> pv_time_ops.steal_clock = kvm_steal_clock;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
> - pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted = kvm_vcpu_is_preempted;
> -#endif
> }
>
> if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI))
> @@ -604,6 +592,14 @@ static void kvm_wait(u8 *ptr, u8 val)
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> +static bool __kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm_steal_time *src = &per_cpu(steal_time, cpu);
> +
> + return !!src->preempted;
> +}
> +PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(__kvm_vcpu_is_preempted);
> +
> /*
> * Setup pv_lock_ops to exploit KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT if present.
> */
> @@ -620,6 +616,12 @@ void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void)
> pv_lock_ops.queued_spin_unlock = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__pv_queued_spin_unlock);
> pv_lock_ops.wait = kvm_wait;
> pv_lock_ops.kick = kvm_kick_cpu;
> + pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__native_vcpu_is_preempted);
> +
> + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME)) {
> + pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted =
> + PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__kvm_vcpu_is_preempted);
> + }
> }
>
> static __init int kvm_spinlock_init_jump(void)
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
> @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ __visible void __native_queued_spin_unlo
> {
> native_queued_spin_unlock(lock);
> }
> -
> PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(__native_queued_spin_unlock);
>
> bool pv_is_native_spin_unlock(void)
> @@ -21,9 +20,16 @@ bool pv_is_native_spin_unlock(void)
> __raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock;
> }
>
> -static bool native_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> +__visible bool __native_vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> {
> - return 0;
> + return false;
> +}
> +PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(__native_vcpu_is_preempted);
> +
> +bool pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted(void)
> +{
> + return pv_lock_ops.queued_spin_unlock.func ==
> + __raw_callee_save__native_vcpu_is_preempted;
> }
>
copy-paste issue...
> struct pv_lock_ops pv_lock_ops = {
> @@ -32,7 +38,7 @@ struct pv_lock_ops pv_lock_ops = {
> .queued_spin_unlock = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__native_queued_spin_unlock),
> .wait = paravirt_nop,
> .kick = paravirt_nop,
> - .vcpu_is_preempted = native_vcpu_is_preempted,
> + .vcpu_is_preempted = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__native_vcpu_is_preempted),
> #endif /* SMP */
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pv_lock_ops);
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_32.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ DEF_NATIVE(pv_mmu_ops, read_cr3, "mov %c
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)
> DEF_NATIVE(pv_lock_ops, queued_spin_unlock, "movb $0, (%eax)");
> +DEF_NATIVE(pv_lock_ops, vcpu_is_preempted, "movl $0, %eax");
> #endif
>
> unsigned paravirt_patch_ident_32(void *insnbuf, unsigned len)
> @@ -26,6 +27,7 @@ unsigned paravirt_patch_ident_64(void *i
> }
>
> extern bool pv_is_native_spin_unlock(void);
> +extern bool pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted(void);
>
> unsigned native_patch(u8 type, u16 clobbers, void *ibuf,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned len)
> @@ -54,6 +56,12 @@ unsigned native_patch(u8 type, u16 clobb
> end = end_pv_lock_ops_queued_spin_unlock;
> goto patch_site;
> }
> + case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted):
> + if (pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted()) {
> + start = start_pv_lock_ops_vcpu_is_preempted;
> + end = end_pv_lock_ops_vcpu_is_preempted;
> + goto patch_site;
> + }
> #endif
>
> default:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_64.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ DEF_NATIVE(, mov64, "mov %rdi, %rax");
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)
> DEF_NATIVE(pv_lock_ops, queued_spin_unlock, "movb $0, (%rdi)");
> +DEF_NATIVE(pv_lock_ops, vcpu_is_preempted, "movl $0, rax");
> #endif
>
> unsigned paravirt_patch_ident_32(void *insnbuf, unsigned len)
> @@ -35,6 +36,7 @@ unsigned paravirt_patch_ident_64(void *i
> }
>
> extern bool pv_is_native_spin_unlock(void);
> +extern bool pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted(void);
>
> unsigned native_patch(u8 type, u16 clobbers, void *ibuf,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned len)
> @@ -66,6 +68,12 @@ unsigned native_patch(u8 type, u16 clobb
> end = end_pv_lock_ops_queued_spin_unlock;
> goto patch_site;
> }
> + case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted):
> + if (pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted()) {
> + start = start_pv_lock_ops_vcpu_is_preempted;
> + end = end_pv_lock_ops_vcpu_is_preempted;
> + goto patch_site;
> + }
> #endif
>
> default:
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu)
> per_cpu(irq_name, cpu) = NULL;
> }
>
> +PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(xen_vcpu_stolen);
> +
> /*
> * Our init of PV spinlocks is split in two init functions due to us
> * using paravirt patching and jump labels patching and having to do
> @@ -136,8 +138,7 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void)
> pv_lock_ops.queued_spin_unlock = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__pv_queued_spin_unlock);
> pv_lock_ops.wait = xen_qlock_wait;
> pv_lock_ops.kick = xen_qlock_kick;
> -
> - pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted = xen_vcpu_stolen;
> + pv_lock_ops.vcpu_is_preempted = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(xen_vcpu_stolen);
> }
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-02 9:08 [PATCH v7 00/11] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex, rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-11-15 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-16 4:19 ` Pan Xinhui [this message]
2016-11-16 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-16 11:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-11-16 11:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-17 5:16 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] KVM: Introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] x86, kvm/x86.c: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] x86, kernel/kvm.c: " Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] x86, xen: " Pan Xinhui
2016-11-02 9:08 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support " Pan Xinhui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a6026a0c-9ad8-5025-c616-eb33f96e91ce@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).