From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F72C433FF for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FC13206A2 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:44:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2FC13206A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=bugzilla.kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45zF5Q0RzbzDqlR for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:44:10 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=bugzilla.kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.98; helo=mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org; envelope-from=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bugzilla.kernel.org Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org [198.145.29.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45zC0j5zq4zDqZL for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:09:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7027288F8 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id BB4CD2891A; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:09:54 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [Bug 204371] BUG kmalloc-4k (Tainted: G W ): Object padding overwritten Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:09:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Memory Management X-Bugzilla-Component: Slab Allocator X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpe@ellerman.id.au X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204371 --- Comment #4 from mpe@ellerman.id.au --- bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org writes: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204371 > > --- Comment #2 from Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) --- > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the > bugzilla web interface). > > > On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 22:35:48 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wr= ote: > >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204371 >>=20 >> Bug ID: 204371 >> Summary: BUG kmalloc-4k (Tainted: G W ): Object >> padding overwritten >> Product: Memory Management >> Version: 2.5 >> Kernel Version: 5.3.0-rc2 >> Hardware: PPC-32 >> OS: Linux >> Tree: Mainline >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Priority: P1 >> Component: Slab Allocator >> Assignee: akpm@linux-foundation.org >> Reporter: erhard_f@mailbox.org >> Regression: No > > cc'ing various people here. > > I suspect proc_cgroup_show() is innocent and that perhaps > bpf_prepare_filter() had a memory scribble. iirc there has been at > least one recent pretty serious bpf fix applied recently. Can others > please take a look? I haven't been able to reproduce this on a 64-bit or 32-bit powerpc machine here. But I don't run gentoo userspace, so I suspect I'm not tripping the same path at boot. I did run the seccomp selftest and that didn't trip it either. cheers --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=