From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=9DpD=XL=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C14C49ED7
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:39:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A55CA2067D
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:39:26 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A55CA2067D
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=bugzilla.kernel.org
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46X45m1mcQzF260
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:39:24 +1000 (AEST)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org
 (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org;
 envelope-from=srs0=vryo=xl=bugzilla.kernel.org=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=bugzilla.kernel.org
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46X3hb0MbJzF4hS
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:21:02 +1000 (AEST)
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [Bug 204819] KASAN still got problems loading some modules at boot
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:20:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo platform_ppc-32@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
X-Bugzilla-Product: Platform Specific/Hardware
X-Bugzilla-Component: PPC-32
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: erhard_f@mailbox.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: platform_ppc-32@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-204819-206035-R5ruK1473Y@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204819-206035@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
References: <bug-204819-206035@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204819

--- Comment #22 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) ---
(In reply to Christophe Leroy from comment #11)
> I have carefully reviewed the flushing calls and have not been able to
> identify any issue.
>=20
> Maybe a SMP issue ? Does this problem also happen without CONFIG_SMP ?
For my 1st (v2) retest I applied the "powerpc/ptdump: Fix addresses display=
 on
PPC32" patch you linked on top of -rc8.

For my 2nd (v3) retest I applied the patch and disabled SMP in the .config.

As you can see the issue still persists without SMP. Also different
'problematic' modules popup even without SMP.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.=