linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: sachinp <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	chandan <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [mainline][BUG][PPC][btrfs][bisected 00801a] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/locking.c:71!
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:09:34 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c51e672f-c5b2-13d9-afa4-8f44a1e8580a@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568188807.30609.6.camel@abdul.in.ibm.com>



On 11.09.19 г. 11:00 ч., Abdul Haleem wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 13:39 +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>

<split>

>> corresponds to?
> 
> btrfs_search_slot+0x8e8/0xb80 maps to fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2751
>                 write_lock_level = BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL;

That doesn't make sense, presumably btrfs_search_slot+0x8e8/0xb80 should
point at or right after the instruction which called
btrfs_set_path_blocking. So either line 2796, 2894, 2901 or 2918 .

>     9a70:       08 00 40 39     li      r10,8
>     9a74:       08 00 a0 3a     li      r21,8
>>   9a78:       6c 00 41 91     stw     r10,108(r1)
>     9a7c:       1c f8 ff 4b     b       9298 <btrfs_search_slot+0x108>
>                 b = btrfs_root_node(root);
> 
> 
> and btrfs_assert_tree_locked+0x10/0x20 maps to ./fs/btrfs/locking.c:71
> 
> void btrfs_assert_tree_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> {
>         BUG_ON(!eb->write_locks);
>       80:       14 01 23 81     lwz     r9,276(r3)
>       84:       34 00 29 7d     cntlzw  r9,r9
>       88:       7e d9 29 55     rlwinm  r9,r9,27,5,31
>       8c:       20 00 29 79     clrldi  r9,r9,32
>>     90:       00 00 09 0b     tdnei   r9,0
>       94:       20 00 80 4e     blr
>       98:       00 00 00 60     nop
>       9c:       00 00 42 60     ori     r2,r2,0
> 
> I have sent direct message attaching vmlinux and the obj dump for
> ctree.c and locking.c
> 

I just got a message from : InterScan Messaging Security Suite about
some policy being broken and no vmscan.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-11  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-03  8:55 [mainline][BUG][PPC][btrfs][bisected 00801a] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/locking.c:71! Abdul Haleem
2019-09-03 10:39 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-09-11  8:00   ` Abdul Haleem
2019-09-11  8:09     ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-09-11  9:14       ` Abdul Haleem
2019-09-03 12:38 ` David Sterba
2019-09-06 15:51 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c51e672f-c5b2-13d9-afa4-8f44a1e8580a@suse.com \
    --to=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).