From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49301CA9EC0 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A3AB20830 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="VLDqKNVO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8A3AB20830 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-s.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471zlM5dM9zDrLb for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:53:19 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 471zhp0VSgzDqJT for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:51:06 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-s.fr Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="VLDqKNVO"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471zhn6hnCz8syv for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:51:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 471zhn6JyYz9sPK; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:51:05 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=c-s.fr (client-ip=93.17.236.30; helo=pegase1.c-s.fr; envelope-from=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-s.fr Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="VLDqKNVO"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr (pegase1.c-s.fr [93.17.236.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 471zhl2Dsyz9sP4 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:51:02 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (mailhub1-int [192.168.12.234]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471zhX5hrXz9tym7; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:50:52 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: localhost; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; insecure key" header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b=VLDqKNVO; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [192.168.12.234]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id flNDJNaxLvii; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:50:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471zhX4fsBz9tym6; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:50:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c-s.fr; s=mail; t=1572277852; bh=64GnMuo56zHeG9k6b8Hbg7OjOuUKAbVDvrd5uT32tz0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VLDqKNVOnve8w4+SVCBiHIY8tUG7zbik4bCLvGfaU9bDZiTXi4N28fC6i6Pb49uJq LD0bwddwTDKLmlIRnrOWNg40/YGzpWq4AGRc4o9xv6TtuKEWxDWnhQM5fCvk61Nz8y EE5IOHnh8dVs55xry+HQDjsScJeiXmhbfTz2+2zI= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA4C8B938; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:50:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id vQa82cbw7owJ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:50:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.4.90] (unknown [192.168.4.90]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76A58B942; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:50:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: passing NULL to clock_getres (VDSO): terminated by unexpected signal 11 To: Nathan Lynch References: <0fc22a08-31d9-e4d1-557e-bf5b482a9a20@c-s.fr> <87wocolvox.fsf@linux.ibm.com> From: Christophe Leroy Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:50:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87wocolvox.fsf@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , Vincenzo Frascino Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Le 28/10/2019 à 16:46, Nathan Lynch a écrit : > Hi Christophe, > > Christophe Leroy writes: >> Hi Nathan, >> >> While trying to switch powerpc VDSO to C version of gettimeofday(), I'm >> getting the following kind of error with vdsotest: >> >> passing NULL to clock_getres (VDSO): terminated by unexpected signal 11 >> >> Looking at commit a9446a906f52 ("lib/vdso/32: Remove inconsistent NULL >> pointer checks"), it seems that signal 11 is expected when passing NULL >> pointer. >> >> Any plan to fix vdsotest ? > > I'm afraid other work has kept me from following up on this promptly, > sorry. I've read the thread here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/87v9skcznp.fsf@igel.home/ > > And it looks like vdsotest does not need a fix (and in fact found a bug) > -- correct? > Yes that's correct, thanks. Christophe