From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB0CC388F9 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3604E20756 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:47:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3604E20756 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHKDR62FJzDqSK for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 07:47:19 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=perches.com (client-ip=216.40.44.94; helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com; envelope-from=joe@perches.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0094.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHKBH1M41zDqR2 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 07:45:25 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E644181D304D; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:45:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: tree02_40096f527253 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1501 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.133.149]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo") From: Joe Perches To: Nick Desaulniers Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:45:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: clang-built-linux , linuxppc-dev , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Miguel Ojeda Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 13:42 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > .On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 7:36 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > Use a more generic form for __section that requires quotes to avoid > > complications with clang and gcc differences. [] > > a quick test of x86_64 and s390 would be good. x86_64 was compiled here. I believe the robot tested the others.