From: Tokunori Ikegami <ikegami.t@gmail.com>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com,
miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, vigneshr@ti.com, richard@nod.at,
"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
marek.vasut@gmail.com,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: write regression since v4.17-rc1
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 03:46:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cedb1604-e024-2738-5b33-15703a653803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <579eab10-594c-d6b2-0ddb-ea6ab8e02856@pengutronix.de>
Hi Ahmad-san,
On 2022/02/15 1:22, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Tokunori-san,
>
> On 13.02.22 17:47, Tokunori Ikegami wrote:
>> Hi Ahmad-san,
>>
>> Thanks for your confirmations. Sorry for late to reply.
> No worries. I appreciate you taking the time.
>
>> Could you please try the patch attached to disable the chip_good() change as before?
>> I think this should work for S29GL964N since the chip_ready() is used and works as mentioned.
> yes, this resolves my issue:
> Tested-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Thanks for your testing. I have just sent the patch to review.
>
>>>>> Doesn't seem to be a buffered write issue here though as the writes
>>>>> did work fine before dfeae1073583. Any other ideas?
>>>> At first I thought the issue is possible to be resolved by using the word write instead of the buffered writes.
>>>> Now I am thinking to disable the changes dfeae1073583 partially with any condition if possible.
>>> What seems to work for me is checking if chip_good or chip_ready
>>> and map_word is equal to 0xFF. I can't justify why this is ok though.
>>> (Worst case bus is floating at this point of time and Hi-Z is read
>>> as 0xff on CPU data lines...)
>> Sorry I am not sure about this.
>> I thought the chip_ready() itself is correct as implemented as the data sheet in the past.
>> But it did not work correctly so changed to use chip_good() instead as it is also correct.
> What exactly in the datasheet makes you believe chip_good is not appropriate?
I just mentioned about the actual issue behaviors as not worked
chip_good() on S29GL964N and not worked chip_ready() on
MX29GL512FHT2I-11G before etc.
Anyway let me recheck the data sheet details as just checked it again
quickly but needed more investigation to understand.
Regards,
Ikegami
>
> Cheers,
> Ahmad
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-14 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 13:24 [BUG] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: write regression since v4.17-rc1 Ahmad Fatoum
2021-12-14 7:23 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-15 17:34 ` Tokunori Ikegami
2022-01-20 13:00 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-01-28 12:55 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-01-29 18:01 ` Tokunori Ikegami
2022-02-07 14:28 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-02-13 16:47 ` Tokunori Ikegami
2022-02-14 16:22 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-02-14 18:46 ` Tokunori Ikegami [this message]
2022-02-20 12:22 ` Tokunori Ikegami
2022-03-04 11:11 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-03-06 15:49 ` Tokunori Ikegami
2022-03-08 9:44 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-03-08 16:13 ` Tokunori Ikegami
2022-03-08 16:23 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-03-08 16:40 ` Tokunori Ikegami
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cedb1604-e024-2738-5b33-15703a653803@gmail.com \
--to=ikegami.t@gmail.com \
--cc=Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).