From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=NKNt=YW=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2490FCA9EB9
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:41:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E0C20862
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:41:31 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D3E0C20862
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472Jnj5kQYzDrBw
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:41:29 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized)
 smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5;
 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com
 [148.163.158.5])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 472JfP0LhBzF12D
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:35:08 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
 by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id
 x9T3IRRO098805; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:35:00 -0400
Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com
 [169.47.144.27])
 by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vxbdsw1xe-1
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
 Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:35:00 -0400
Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9T4Ylqc011496;
 Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:35:00 GMT
Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com
 (b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.18])
 by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2vvds6r57e-1
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
 Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:34:59 +0000
Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com
 (b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.234])
 by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
 x9T4YvRX59310470
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK);
 Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:34:57 GMT
Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E20D6A051;
 Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:34:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91A36A04F;
 Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:34:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [9.204.200.92] (unknown [9.204.200.92])
 by b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
 Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:34:55 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] libnvdimm/namespace: Make namespace size
 validation arch dependent
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
References: <20191028094825.21448-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
 <20191028212142.GB9826@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <cfb6cd96-3f81-7ee8-150f-69924d446540@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:04:54 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191028212142.GB9826@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, ,
 definitions=2019-10-28_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0
 priorityscore=1501
 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0
 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0
 mlxlogscore=888 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910290027
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
 linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On 10/29/19 2:51 AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c
>> index 377712e85605..2e661a08dae5 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c
>> @@ -17,14 +17,31 @@ void arch_wb_cache_pmem(void *addr, size_t size)
>>   	unsigned long start = (unsigned long) addr;
>>   	flush_dcache_range(start, start + size);
>>   }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_wb_cache_pmem);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_wb_cache_pmem);
> 
> Unrelated change?
> 
>

Yes, will split that as a separate patch.

-aneesh