From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A33C5DF60 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323FA2087E for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:04:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 323FA2087E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476wxJ1L4GzDr8p for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 04:04:04 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476wtQ4Vf1zF4sm for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 04:01:34 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476wtP1lgdz8tTf for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 04:01:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 476wtN3hLjz9sP3; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 04:01:32 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476wtM5mdfz9sP7 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 04:01:31 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA5GxoPm089412 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:01:28 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w3bbp5sk6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 12:01:24 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:01:15 -0000 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:01:12 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xA5H0b2a15139156 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:00:37 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E2D11C04C; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:01:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390C011C054; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:01:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.51.136] (unknown [9.199.51.136]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:01:09 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] Documentation/ABI: mark /sys/kernel/fadump_* sysfs files deprecated To: Sourabh Jain , mpe@ellerman.id.au References: <20191018130557.2217-1-sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com> <20191018130557.2217-4-sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>

From: Hari Bathini Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:09 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19110517-0012-0000-0000-00000360F5A5 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19110517-0013-0000-0000-0000219C4FB8 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-05_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911050140 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 05/11/19 2:24 PM, Sourabh Jain wrote: > > > On 10/21/19 1:11 PM, Hari Bathini wrote: >> >> >> On 18/10/19 6:35 PM, Sourabh Jain wrote: >>> The /sys/kernel/fadump_* sysfs files are replicated under >> >> [...] >> >>> +Note: The following FADump sysfs files are deprecated. >>> + >>> + Deprecated Alternative >>> + ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> + /sys/kernel/fadump_enabled /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_enabled >>> + /sys/kernel/fadump_registered /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_registered >>> + /sys/kernel/fadump_release_mem /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_release_mem >> >> /sys/kernel/fadump/* looks tidy instead of /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_* >> I mean, /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_enabled => /sys/kernel/fadump/enabled and such.. > > > > Could you please confirm whether you want to address the sysfs file path differently or > actually changing the sysfs file name from fadump_enabled to enabled. I meant, given the path "/sys/kernel/fadump/", the prefix fadump_ is redundant. If there are no conventions that we should retain the same file name, I suggest to drop the fadump_ prefix and just call them enabled, registered, etc.. - Hari