From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC8CC38A2A for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 20:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99CC21582 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 20:44:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D99CC21582 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buserror.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49Jj4g19ySzDrFY for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 06:44:50 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=buserror.net (client-ip=165.227.176.147; helo=baldur.buserror.net; envelope-from=oss@buserror.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buserror.net Received: from baldur.buserror.net (baldur.buserror.net [165.227.176.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Jj1w71bjzDrH6 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 06:42:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from [2601:449:8480:af0:12bf:48ff:fe84:c9a0] by baldur.buserror.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jX9pC-0000TT-Pr; Fri, 08 May 2020 15:42:27 -0500 Message-ID: From: Scott Wood To: Darren Stevens , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 15:42:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200507223025.0164b95b@Cyrus.lan> References: <20200507223025.0164b95b@Cyrus.lan> Organization: Red Hat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2601:449:8480:af0:12bf:48ff:fe84:c9a0 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: darren@stevens-zone.net, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, chzigotzky@xenosoft.de X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: oss@buserror.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/mpc85xx: Add Cyrus P5040 device tree source X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 02 Aug 2016 21:08:31 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on baldur.buserror.net) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: chzigotzky@xenosoft.de Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 22:30 +0100, Darren Stevens wrote: > > +/include/ "p5040si-pre.dtsi" > + > +/ { > + model = "varisys,CYRUS5040"; > + compatible = "varisys,CYRUS"; Is this board 100% compatible with the Cyrus P5020 board, down to every last quirk, except for the SoC plugged into it? If not, they shouldn't have the same compatible. If they are, then couldn't everything in this file but the SoC include be moved to a dtsi shared with cyrus_p5020.dts? > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + interrupt-parent = <&mpic>; > + > + aliases{ > + ethernet0 = &enet4; > + ethernet1 = &enet10; > + }; Space after "aliases" -Scott